Hunter Biden Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

So who is going to jail for stealing the laptop?

DD

 

It was abandoned, not stolen.

 

There is no stolen laptop. Cokehead left it at a repair shop for 5 months which legally made it the shops.

 

This is what Adam Schiff said:

There's nothing inaccurate about this statement. Do you understand how the emails can be real but the narrative false?

 

So you are saying making a copy of someone's personal hardrive is not theft?

I guess you are ok with people going through your garbage to get information about you...and make copies of it.

 

From years of @basso threads and posts, I believe he understands and has adopted it as his Modus Operandi

 

In your opinion, did the repair shop legally have ownership of the laptop and its contents?

 

Let me ask you a question. If I leave my tax return at your house, does that give you the right to share my social security number with everyone and profit off of it?

Let's say you own the paper it's printed on. Does that give you the ownership of the information as well? Because if you do, I think you'd really be popular in China.

 

If it's understood that I have legal ownership of a copy of your tax return, then yes, I should be able to do whatever I want with it as long as I'm not breaking any laws.

I don't really understand your point here. Can you clarify?

I previously asked you a question with a yes/no answer. Would you mind answering the question?

 

In delaware, you'd be in violation of privacy laws (not to mention fraud).

 

Actually, I wouldn't. Please re-read what I wrote.

 

You are contradicting yourself. I asked if you could share that information with anyone, and you responded yes. Then you said so long I don't break any laws. So which is it? Can you or can't you?

My point is that you don't own the information on the hard drive.

 

I'll ask this question for the 100th time.

What is the crime again?

 

This whole thing is a great way to distract from Trump's involvement (and impeachment) for trying to bribe Ukrainian officials.

 

Am I missing something here? What exactly is the "aha!" moment?

 

There isn't one.

They can't even answer basic questions about the scandal, or even what it is.

This is just a bone they are throwing to the tribe so they can keeps the conspiracies alive. Wait 6 months and they will rehash some new revelation on the Steele Dossier, then another six months and there will be some Durham nothingburger. Its all formulaic at this point.

 

It depends who you share it with. I would imagine that if I find evidence of crimes, I should be allowed to share it with the appropriate authorities.

Your point is incorrect. You do own the information on the hard drive. However, you don't have carte blanche to do whatever you want with it. You still have to act within the confines of the law.

 

@Nook need a ruling