1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Ukraine

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by NewRoxFan, Nov 25, 2018.

  1. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,801
    Likes Received:
    5,207
    it’s very, very clear from what you said that Tulsi is a Democrat indeed and even far left on some issues, I completely know that ..yes I have an idea what I’m talking about. It’s not about me having a weird fetish fantasy about her and wishing I could sleep with her as some knuckleheads suggest (yes she is attractive but that is besides the point) but what I see as a Democrat with real ideals from a policy left based stance but ALSO willing to not follow the crowd,…that is also quite clear so you guys on the left wing side of the fence HATE her because she isn’t lockstep with checking all the boxes on what left wingers is suppose to say and think
     
  2. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,806
    Likes Received:
    132,379
    This is part of the problem with Tucker Carlson and people that believe this garbage, and it is garbage.

    Of course bio-labs exist in the Ukraine........ there are literally thousands of bio labs in the USA and they are all over the world.

    Further, for years the WHO and the rest of the world has known that the USA has helped the Ukraine with funding and destruction of waste.

    Guess what? The WHO and EU also have financially supported these labs.

    Why? BECAUSE THEY MITIGATE THE RISK

    The USA has never hid these labs, they are on the embassy website and they were specifically covered under the Biological Threat Program started by the USA over 20 years ago, and in 2005 PUBLICLY the USA and Ukraine Ministry of Public Health joined forces to secure that the labs were safer. We provide funding and technical support.

    In fact these labs were in the news a couple months ago, BEFORE the invasion.

    This isn't anything "new", nor is it anything alarming or unethical.

    In fact Russia has made similar claims in the past that were found to be BASELESS.

    I have attached below a link of a study that discusses prior investigations and claims made by the Russians against the USA concerning bio-weapons.
    https://cissm.umd.edu/sites/default...iological weapons use from Putin s Russia.pdf


    So what has happened is we have conspiracy theory BS, which was on 4-Chan months ago.... that spreads word of mouth amongst some conservatives, Russia is then called out by the US over plans to use chemical weapons...... and then Russia claims the USA has biological weapons in the Ukraine to try and cover for the murder of innocent people caught on video. It would have already died down except Tucker Carlson reports on it, and then Tulsi reports on it...... where there is zero credibility. Then Carlson says "US says there are bio-labs" as if it someone proves his point when all it does is show how poorly he understands the situation OR he knows his viewers will believe it...... when it isn't true and is against the interests of the USA.

    Russia even went to the UN with their claim.... and no one other than China made any comment in support of Russia and all China said was that any use of bioweapons is serious........

    The UN asked for proof and despite claims of 30 networks of biological weapon manufacturing, Russia could produce ZERO proof....... and the UN nations scolded Russia.

    You are falling for Russian propaganda, and people like Tucker Carlson know it isn't real.... but it drives views and he apparently doesn't care that it causes false panic when this nation should be coming together.

    You can research everything I have said. The BBC even did an expose on it and concluded that everything was in the open and discussed and consistent with what the USA has said.

    It is scary to me how many people that claim they are patriots of the USA now suddenly believe a bloody dictator that openly has contempt for the USA, is a known liar and is in the midst of taking over another country and is desperate and will do anything to save himself.
     
    jo mama, myco, superfob and 4 others like this.
  3. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,801
    Likes Received:
    5,207
    A lot of what she says is indeed true to be honest .. or at least a point of contention (to the wokes)
     
    #5723 ROXRAN, Mar 15, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2022
  4. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,786
    Likes Received:
    20,443
    This post should but sadly won't end the pointless debate over biolabs. It as ridiculous to begin with and is not now nor ever was controversial.

    There is and always been zero reason for anyone be concerned over biolabs in Ukraine.
     
    Nook and Exiled like this.
  5. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
    Your comrades also sanctioned Hillary Clinton, despite her not being in government for years...



    Interesting who they didn't sanction...

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Exiled

    Exiled Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Messages:
    5,125
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Russia is the world most important phase I bio-labs ,quite hard to think of any recently approved drugs that was not at least 80% Russian contribution via drugs companies,cheaper and less restriction , Ukraine might wanted to compete for these types of revenues should not be out of ordinary
     
    Nook likes this.
  7. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,283
    Likes Received:
    9,253
  8. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,677
    Likes Received:
    22,398
    Okay you are then saying you are actually a Democrat but you vote for and spout right wing propaganda talking points because you want someone who "is willing to not follow the crowd"????

    Like what does "not follow the crowd" mean specifically?? Like specifics on positions that matter to voters?? What the hell are you talking about?

    And no going on FoxNews to talk crap about Hillary Clinton isn't "not following the crowd." It's attention grabbing to an audience she knows hates Hillary Clinton. It's not a substantive position on anything. It's playing people like you for fools.

    What you are saying would be like Jon Bolton going on MSNBC to talk crap about Trump and then me coming on here to say "You know what... I'd vote for Jon Bolton BECAUSE HE'S NOT FOLLOWING THE CROWD." What a stupid statement that would be.

    On actually substantive policies the primary difference that Gabbard is "Not Following the Crowd" is on Assad and Vladamir Putin. And sorry... if not having affection for dictators who murder pregnant women by bombing maternity wards and using chemical weapons on your own citizens is "Following the Crowd" count me in as someone who is damn proud to "Follow the Crowd" if "the Crowd" generally does not support murderers.
     
  9. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,283
    Likes Received:
    9,253
  10. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,677
    Likes Received:
    22,398
    The only reason to be concerned with Biolabs in Ukraine is because a murderous dictator is bombing them for no damn reason other than grievance.

    BUT...

    You know what is more dangerous than bombing Biolabs???.... BOMBING FREAKING CHERNOBYL!!!

    Where is the Tucker Carlson segment talking about how countries that have nuclear reactors in them need to be invaded and bombed? Why isn't Tulsi's twitter feed putting out videos talking about the dangers of Nuclear facilities and justifying bombing maternity wards because a country has a nuclear power plant??

    Like if you are so concerned about Ukraine having biolabs you sure as sh$t should be concerned about them having a nuclear disaster site.

    However these folks are just idiots... to be honest. This was all started because of a QAnon troll who came up with this idea, and then Russian trolls picked up on the stupidity of people like Roxran and are probably laughing their a$$es of thinking how funny it is how easy these people are to find ANY AND EVERY reason to support Putin politically no matter this guy does.
     
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  11. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,801
    Likes Received:
    5,207
    Hold on a sec lol, @Sweet Lou 4 2 just posted several issues that I can legitimately get behind that Tulsi stated that was beyond the only Russia issue you think is the only thing I’m seeing. She is mentioning what’s happening in several areas: Kamala chosen for her skin and sex , COVID tactics , Biden screwing up as evidence by two eyes logic and polls …thank you Lou for the supportive points btw…what she says makes sense absolutely. and you going on a silly nonsensical tangent about having “affection” for dictators murdering people is beyond reprehensible and blatantly misguided
     
  12. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,801
    Likes Received:
    5,207
    Someone give dobro his medication pills and safe place stuffed animal. He’s frothing at the mouth and losing it …thanks
     
  13. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,677
    Likes Received:
    22,398
    THOSE AREN'T POLICY ISSUES

    Good lord. Those are just hatred for Democrats issues. It's a tactic of not disagreeing with a Democrat on a policy... but just using hyperbole to suggest "I'd do the same thing... BUT BETTER!!"

    "Biden screwing up".... like what does that mean? What was different from a policy perspective that Tulsi would have done?? Biden pulled out of Afghanistan.... okay.... You know what Tulsi's #1 policy position is???.... PULLING OUT OF FOREIGN WARS.

    "Silly nonsensical tangent about having "affection for dictators"....

    I mean.... Tulsi and Tucker Carlson... HAVE AFFECTION FOR DICTATORS.... I mean Tucker Carlson literally hosted his show from Hungary to show support of Orban, and you are obviously showing affection for Tulsi Gabbard today so......Ain't that silly. Does Tulsi not show support for Vladamir Putin by reciting Russian state TV talking points getting her featured constantly in Russia???? Have you not posted here all this afternoon about how much you support her??

    If calling a spade a spade, calling water wet, etc. is "reprehensible and blatantly misguided" then I'm glad you think I'm reprehensible and blatantly misguided.
     
  14. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,677
    Likes Received:
    22,398
    Yeah I know I do need to calm down and stop being upset at people reciting the talking points and pet conspiracy theories of people bombing and murdering pregnant women at maternity wards.

    It's totally me I know, I'm the one losing it...
     
  15. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,182
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    Do you understand the point of what I was posting or are you just trying to spin my post to your advantage in a debate?
     
  16. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,182
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    Some of what she is saying is true, but some of it is lies (or at least heavily biased). There are definitely some lies in what I shared, but that's not really the big issue I have with her.

    The problem with her is that her social media feed is essentially the conservative right-wing talking points, and that's very odd for a Democrat. There's absolutely nothing in support of Biden. And she continues to go after Clinton who isn't even in politics anymore. In other words - she's playing to her crowd - she's playing to people such as yourself, and that should give you pause.

    What is she catering to you? Buttering you up? Why was she talking about Biden the war monger and how he was going to take us to war with Putin just a few weeks ago - notice how she just dropped that now that it's clear it's not true, and has instead started bashing him on the sanctions? Notice how she blames NATO and not Russia for the invasion?

    There's a lot wrong with her if you aren't picking up on it.
     
  17. subtomic

    subtomic Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2000
    Messages:
    4,243
    Likes Received:
    2,793
    Here's the thing about "not following the crowd"...it's a cool and admirable trait when its a rebellion against rules that are intrinsically silly (like not wearing white after Labor Day), intrinsically oppressive (like Republican book banning) or intrinsically cruel (like Republican gay bashing)

    But when someone is a "free thinker" or "independent" yet ignores basic facts or common decency, they aren't still cool or admirable. It just makes them a contrarian douche.

    Again, simpletons don't understand this distinction and that's why they so often fall in love with rebels without a clue like Tulsi.
     
    Xopher, dmoneybangbang and dobro1229 like this.
  18. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    22,534
    Likes Received:
    14,268
    [​IMG]
     
  19. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    22,534
    Likes Received:
    14,268
    Being a contrarian douche.....

    [​IMG]
     
    subtomic and dobro1229 like this.
  20. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,677
    Likes Received:
    22,398
    You can look back at the Dem primaries threads and I was pretty loud about calling out her strategy of essentially running against the party as an antagonist (following Trump's playbook from 2016), and outright saying it's actually not a terrible strategy, but for her terrible delivery of the tactic and the dishonesty. I've also said numerous times that it might be a really good idea if Biden's looking like he's going to get blown out in 24 to allow an "outsider" run as the nominee and shake up the process a bit. There's a world at which Tulsi Gabbard is actually really healthy for the party if her outsider take wasn't coming across as so dishonest, downright nasty, and dangerous from a US national security standpoint (Putin/Assad weirdness)

    I absolutely think there is room for people that "don't follow the crowd" so to speak but Tulsi aint that. It's all hyperbolic disagreements on style & personal attacks and virtually no disagreements on substance and policy... even to the point where she had to endorse Biden in the end because she knows she's not going to change her policy positions which in the end align fairly well.

    The only substantive policy choices she'll disagree with as always is anything that hurts Putin/Assad's causes which is just bizarre, and usually where Democrat's issue with her starts and stops for damn good reasons.
     
    Xopher and subtomic like this.

Share This Page