1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[The Hill] Spotify sides with Joe Rogan after Neil Young ultimatum

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Os Trigonum, Jan 26, 2022.

  1. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,379
    Likes Received:
    47,273
     
  2. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,504
    Likes Received:
    121,914
  3. Ubiquitin

    Ubiquitin Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Messages:
    19,567
    Likes Received:
    14,570
    I too have pulled my music from Spotify. Because it's a scam for musicians.
     
    Os Trigonum likes this.
  4. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,120
    Likes Received:
    23,404
    It's down more than the avg. No, Rogan didn't do it. Young did with the attention he's getting.
     
  5. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,120
    Likes Received:
    23,404
    Netflix stock plummeted after disappointing 4q earning announcement.

    Spotify 4q earning hasn't been announced yet. It's in a few day.
     
  6. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    Nothing Neil Young is doing is "censorship" or "censorious" or "censor-riffic". Neil Young nor Spotify are the government, Neil Young doesn't own Spotify and Neil Young has his own right to where he decides where he wants his property distributed.

    Yet another example of the bizarre arguments that some are making regarding censorship. It's not just about actual government it's now about private individuals deciding they don't want to be on the same platform as another private individual. Under that reasoning then if someone were to leave Clutchfans because they didn't like another poster's takes then that would "censorship."
     
    TheFreak, jiggyfly, Ubiquitin and 2 others like this.
  7. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,120
    Likes Received:
    23,404
    The proponent of free speech forgot that Neil Young is expressing his speech.
     
    jiggyfly and Ubiquitin like this.
  8. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,504
    Likes Received:
    121,914
    nothing bizarre about it. From this and other threads it seems to me that you have an extremely narrow sense of what counts as "censorship"--which is fine, you are entitled to your beliefs. But I believe you share in common with others here a type of moral blindness to the dangers posed by these broader examples of censorship and threats to free speech.
     
  9. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    I have both a Constitutional sense regarding censorship.

    If we take this expansive view of censorship you're proposing then you're threatening to censor me by accusing me of "moral blindness"

    The real moral blindness here is using "censorship" as a cudgel the free expression of other's economic and property rights. It's a blindness that you view this argument only from the one side while ignoring the fact that Neil YOung has a right to how his property is used.
     
    jiggyfly and Amiga like this.
  10. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,593
    Likes Received:
    9,106
    once again, your reading comprehension is very poor. i never proclaimed any such thing.

    once again you are showing that you know nothing about what kind of person neil young is. he has been an outspoken rabble rouser for over 50 years now and anybody who is a fan at all of him knows this. his band mates know it, his record label knows it, his fans know it.

    you remind me of all those dorks who were upset with willie nelson when he criticized trump - "willie is a liberal now!!!"...those people clearly knew nothing about willie just like you clearly know nothing about neil young.

    another way you show that you know nothing about neil young is this comment...

    "crawling back to spotify" - lol.

    all you have to do is explain to me how im "far left", which you said you would do after you got back from karate class like a month ago.
     
  11. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,504
    Likes Received:
    121,914
    actually Neil Young doesn’t have the streaming rights to his own music, Warner Reprise does
     
  12. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,120
    Likes Received:
    23,404
    What is your proposed solution to this danger?
     
  13. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,504
    Likes Received:
    121,914
    err on the side of free speech and freedom of conscience always—even if it means tolerating and defending the rights of Klansman and Nazis to assemble, publish, or march
     
  14. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,120
    Likes Received:
    23,404
    I was looking for a bit more specific.

    We already do that today - the gov cannot suppress speech except for rare cases.

    Surely, you aren't proposing expanding that restriction to individual and private entity? But that's what I hearing from some on the right. What else?
     
  15. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,504
    Likes Received:
    121,914
    toleration is not a restriction. and yes, that is precisely what I advocate
     
  16. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,571
    Likes Received:
    17,546
    this is not about Joe Rogan's views per se, his show just happens to be the largest honey pot for where unpopular/minority viewpoints (or at least unpopular among elite government/media/tech circles) can be heard

    and so the elites want to shut it down

    if Rogan were to be censored, those views would flow to some other outlet

    the left plays whack-a-mole going from forum to forum to try and chase these views out of the public square. They justify this by claiming their views represent truth, and opposing views represent dangerous misinformation.
     
    Gioan Baotixita likes this.
  17. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,120
    Likes Received:
    23,404
    wasn’t talking about tolerance

    Who would decide what individual and private cannot restrict? Politicians and judges?

    If a publisher decided to no longer publish a book because it’s not a moneymaker, the gov can force them to?

    If an individual does not allow swear words on her website and would remove them or ban users who wouldn’t comply because she wants it to be for kids under 10, then the gov can force her to unban and un-delete? Or would you have some judgment on when it crosses the line, with the gov making those judgments?
     
  18. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,593
    Likes Received:
    9,106
    spotify is a private company - its not the public square.

    and dont pretend like right wingers and trumpers dont also try to chase opposing views of out public (or private) squares. look no further than liz cheney and other actual conservative republicans, who are being run out of their own party for not going along with trumps lies. or trump telling his supporters to not eat oreos, use amazon, shop at macys, drink coke, attend MLB games or buy apple products.

    as far as rogan, he is helping to disseminate dangerous misinformation. but its a free country and i believe in his right to do that if he wants. spotify is a private business and they can host him if they want. neil young is a private citizen/artist and he should be free to not be involved with spotify if he doesnt want to be. nobody is censoring anybody.

    in the end, its on americans to not be so stupid and gullible as to believe everything that comes out of his show.
     
  19. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,571
    Likes Received:
    17,546
    the difference is Joe Rogan isn't actively trying to prevent anyone's views from being heard

     
    #139 Commodore, Jan 29, 2022
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2022
  20. CCorn

    CCorn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    22,308
    Likes Received:
    23,111
    Neil Young is acting as the invisible hand. I thought you weirdos jerked off to Ayn Rand.

    I guess it’s more important to cry about how mean society is to you.
     
    jiggyfly likes this.

Share This Page