judging by all the sobbing in court, there was a boy playing with guns while people around him were agitated on that infamous day in Kenosha. Kids should stay at home and play with toys instead of "assisting communities" while scaring the bejesus out of adults by having military rifles on their person. Stop making this out as some sort of a moral win. The kid should've been taught a lesson but legislators in WI are too dumb to write their laws properly.
Textbook Self Defense is traveling to another state, giving someone money to purchase a gun for you that you legally can't buy, while "defending" a business you have no connection to at all? I guess I don't have the same textbooks.
A non professional providing security and assistance with a firearm 3 pt slung around them is a vigilante.
DCCC chairman lies and says Jacob Blake is dead and was unarmed. This is the kind of misinformation that can actually get people killed.
Thanks for posting this. Owned many guns, never joined up any groups. Just joined up today with these folks.
The entire purpose of a state, at the most basic level, is to keep a monopoly on violence. When the state concedes its monopoly openly to a violent mob, the people are meant to fend for themselves. That's how vigilante justice happens. You either crack down on the criminals and remove the need for vigilantes, see the end of the reconstruction and the downfall of the first KKK, or crack down on the vigilantes and give the criminals free reign to enact violence at will, and end up like Mexico, Columbia, US-occupied Afganistan, and other failed narco states.
I always love the incredibly disingenuous 'traveled to another state' line. Such an absurdly dishonest statement. he traveled 17 miles, the same 17 miles he does every day for work, but of course you won't say that, you instead say 'he traveled across a state border!!!'
I mean... Commodore: does anyone doubt their would be widespread rioting if the people Rittenhouse shot were black? Me: I doubt it because there aren't riots anytime a black person is killed by a white person. You: Summer of 2020 would like a word with you. So you're implying that in the summer of 2020 that there were riots for every black person killed.
the purpose of the law was circumvented in this case in many ways - and it needs to be pointed out, which the poster you replied to did.
To use the phrase "would like a word with you" in direct reply to my post, which was only that sentence means that you think my statement is wrong. That's what that phrase means. "Would like a word with you." when used in that manner, you meant to contradict and challenge my statement, did you not? If you had no issues with my statement then why post that? So, I'll ask you now, what was the meaning of your post?
If you actually watched the trial or the videos you would know most people except for one crazy ass person didn't even give two ***** he was there wandering around with his rifle. In fact when he walked around the agitated crowd no one really batted an eye. It was quite literally when he tried to put out a fire, Rosenbaum freaked the **** out and started chasing him and tried to attack him. I actually feel kinda bad for the second and third person, they thought there was a random shooter based on the gun shot. But it was just a mentally ill crazy attacking an armed person for putting out a fire he started.
