With all the video evidence , this case never should have gone to trial to begin with , the prosecution never had a case. What I really have a problem with is the prosecution isn't in pursuit of justice which is their actual job - Justice. They've gone off the deep end of political bias instead. If Justice was the prosecutions goal , this trial never happened.
My point is that illegal or not, it would save lives if people didn't act as vigilantes and were more responsible than Rittenhouse. Simple enough.
Yeah, no way me and you could be friends. I didn't have to worry about any 3 of those guys. 1 was an idiot, but that doesn't deserve being shot, the other 2 were trying to stop a shooter without shooting him despite one having a gun.
The prosecutor is a DUmas.s talking about bullets and AR15 FMJ projectiles. It’s designed to fragment not keep going forever. It’s actually safer than some common rounds like 9mm, .45 on penetration without break up, part of the reason Gage arm had a chunk taken off in explosion is because the round fragmented the way it’s suppose to. There is a reason SWAT teams often employ .223 ammo as primary firearms is because it works spectacularly in CQB with minimal richochet issues
Just because a charge is tossed, doesn't mean it wasn't illegal. Prosecution probably doesn't care much about a minor offense that likely only carries a small fine.
City of Kenosha has an Ordinance for under 18 past 10:30pm. And they dismissed charges for everyone charged under the emergency order during the protests.
Yep, if you dont believe that defending yourself from 3 guys chasing you, one of which hit you with a skateboard and another pulling a gun on me, then you're right we can never be friends. My friends believe in the 2nd Amendment.
My friends believe in the 2nd amendment too, but they don't go walking around with their rifles when they aren't hunting. No responsible gun owner acts like that.
Agreed, Rittenhouse wasn't acting as a vigilante. He was cleaning up the mess the vigilantes had created when he was attacked and then he responded appropriately. I'm just glad he had a weapon on him to defend himself. Can you imagine what those 3 thugs would've done to him if he wasn't armed. They were clearly saying they wanted to Cranium him (Shoot him in the head) and one of the thugs was carrying so he easily could've carried out that threat if not for Rittenhouse taking care of his business and saving his life. I notice when people who defend their property get killed like Dorn their is very little media coverage and no outcry from people on here about Dorn (A retired LEO) getting killed. But let a BLM activist get killed and you see what you're seeing on the news today.
Do you think they were saying that merely because of his presence or that it was because he was carrying an AR15? Do you think the reaction to him would've been different had he not been carrying a weapon?
It's been established in that court that he was legal in carrying the weapon .... It was Huber, Grosskreutz and Jump kick man who acted as vigilante's ..... in response to Rittenhouse defending himself from Rosenbaum who had twice threatened his life. Without Rosenbaum , this night ends peacefully for all involved ....
