There's no doubt they would be good for society. People exercising their rights as long as they aren't killing people/stealing/destroying property is a good thing. Because the lawlessness that's currently going on isn't good for society and law abiding citizens in particular. People need to take a stand against lawlessness even if the govt wont.
Lol what. I said I wouldn’t make fun of him because of his looks. He has the face of a pipe fitter. I’m defending him. #FreeKyle
Wow. You are ****ed up. I'm flipping the Rittenhouse case on its head where it's a black teen that "has every right to be there" and has "the right (Per the constitution) to protect themselves" and you are fantasizing about plenty of bloodshed and feeding people to gators. You are the poster boy for far right hypocrisy. Black teens with guns are lawless, rioters who should be killed and fed to gators. White teens with guns are heroes.
What is up with this judge, lol? https://www.theverge.com/platform/a...ittenhouse-bruce-schroeder-screenshot-zoom-in
The judge was right on that tho. It is not the same as a magnifying glass. Pinch to zoom does add data in the form of pixels. The colors are decided by interpolation so if you zoom in real big a small black blob gets bigger. Just the physical nature of a screen being a bunch of small pixels precludes it from not adding data when zooming.
I worked as a pipe fitter one summer in Port Lavaca. Heavy, dirty work, but I’ve managed to maintain my looks by applying sunscreens and moisturizers. Riitenhouse still has his baby fat, he looks more like a plumber apprentice than a pipe fitter, unless you meant it as a dig to his IQs.
The way he has been treating the DA in this case has shown nothing but bias he should step down. I'm going to go ahead and say it had this been a black defendant this judge would be allowing everything the Da has been saying to be allowed
He has allowed everything the aDA said. He never instructed the jury to disregard the aDA comments on Mr. Rittenhouse's silence implying he is lying, he just pretended to be angry when the jury was not in the room. No sanction, just yelling and allowing him to get away with it. I fully accept you haven't really been following along to know this, the headlines have been pretty off base.
You do know that every time he has made these remarks it's been without the jury being in the courtroom.
Wrong, he said the 5th amendment question, the defense objected and the judge dismissed the jury for a 5 minute break. It was during cross which the jury might have actually been paying attention too.
And you'd have been dead months ago if you took a drink every time Trump Republicans said the election was stolen.
You might want to watch the footage before stating incorrect information. The ADA was leading Rittenhouse into that propensity evidence that the judge already ruled was inadmissible. The judge excused the jury before scolding the ADA. The judge has actually given the ADA a very long leash with the amount of violations the ADA has made.
