I am not saying it's right of course (do I really need to say that?) but how many of the tea party folks have had their children and grandchildren or someone they know killed or taken advantage of by bad police officers? We can play this game all day. The point I am making is people are inherently going to automatically look at an angle that makes Rittenhouse innocent. Just as someone else will attempt to make a justification as to why those protests against police violence against blacks would burn down a building or loot. Instead, please reply to me specifically about what I am writing about. I could sit there and give multiple examples with the same premise. If you are going to just literally do what I am writing about lol well I dunno what to say.
Binger sucked so badly as a prosecutor. He seemed to think the skateboard is not a deadly weapon. A skateboard is a heavy blunt object you dope, if I wack you real hard with enough force to the back of your head or your temple, your skull would have been cracked wide open. This hack is running for political office and it shows.
Like… I can’t even imagine what in my life would have to go wrong to lead me to be a Kyle Rittenhouse fan. You guys are seriously disturbed.
The city of Seattle wasn't burned down. The video you posted does not show the city of Seattle being burned down. So far you've shown me zero of what I've asked to see in links. If this is how you and other supporters of the issues you champion back your claims, it's no wonder that your side has lost almost every single law suit, can't make any headway in the conspiracy theories you push regarding vaccine mandates, etc. When you are able to post a link of cities being burned down or corporate media talking heads claiming Rittenhouse is a domestic terrorist, then I'll respond. Otherwise, there is no point.
He should demonstrate the benign effects of a full size skateboard by taking a wack to the head full blast just so he can convince everyone lol, such an annoying prosecutor
There hasn't been one linked in this thread. I have looked at all of the ones that were supposedly examples. There has been 1/2 of one. You have tried twice and failed twice to post examples. Now you claim that there were dozens in this thread. Perhaps I have some posters on ignore. If you care to link those posts or give me the post number, I promise I will look. I am curious. Are you confusing with general chat with broadcasts from corporate media outlets and talking heads?
I imagine that if it happened today @Commodore and @ROXRAN would be doing deep dive research about the criminal backgrounds of those in the OKC building that Timothy McVeigh bombed to justify a righteous kill. Books on African American history may be getting burned, but glad to see @Commodore is still a student of the Turner Diaries.
There were many people referring to him as a domestic terrorists in the media, generally while editorializing. I don’t know if broadcasters ever tried to portray him in that way. A sample: https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a33809690/kenosha-shooting-17-year-old-militia/ A 17-year-old crosses state lines with a military-style firearm, allegedly kills two people in an act of what could only be called terrorist tourism, and not only was he allowed to walk away from the scene of the crime, he got to go home and sleep in his own bed for a night.[/quote] https://www.salon.com/2020/11/23/tr...-legacy-the-rights-open-embrace-of-terrorism/ Trump's on his way out, but leaves a lasting legacy: The right's open embrace of terrorism How did the Kenosha shooter post $2 million in bail? Because conservatives are normalizing right-wing terrorism https://www.mpac.org/blog/statements-press/declare-rittenhouse-what-he-is-a-terrorist.php While Rittenhouse’s motivations may be unclear at this point, his actions are not. He crossed state lines, making his crime a federal offense, and committed several violent attacks on civilians in order to further the social and political movement which has emerged in opposition to the recent calls for racial justice. It cannot be lost that this incident satisfies the definition of domestic terrorism. That is, “the unlawful use, or threatened use, of violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States (or its territories) without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/imagine-if-kyle-rittenhouse-was-muslim-n1248693 The great irony here is that a Rittenhouse poses a much bigger threat to security in this country than any so-called Khalid Rehman. You don't have to take my word for it; according to Trump's own Department of Homeland Security, domestic extremists — specifically "white supremacist extremists" — pose the "most persistent and lethal" terrorist threat to the United States.
oh he absolutely deserved to die, but that isn't the point this is about how a mentally disturbed violent person might behave in a threatening manner that would justify an act of self-defense
Thank you. This is the best response so far. I know that various people referred to him as a domestic terrorist. I was questioning about the claim that corporate media outlets had talking heads calling him a domestic terrorist. I was genuinely interested because I know that most media outlets go out of the way to cover themselves and throw in "alleged" when referring to people on trial but not convicted. They often still do it even when the person has confessed but prior to conviction. So I was really interested in the claim that many were calling him a domestic terrorist. I wanted to see the cluos/episodes and view the context. I feel like the Salon article comes closest to fitting the bill. Thanks for the links.
https://www.yahoo.com/now/white-domestic-terrorists-kyle-rittenhouse-192659233.html Here you go. Talking head or print media. The MSM, they’re all just a bunch of lying POS which you seemed to get your news source from. Minneapolis being burned down. I guess your definition of burning down a city is when the whole city is burned to the ground. Lol You are such a muppet. When I see assholes setting fires to buildings, torching businesses with their homemade napalms, to me and every reasonable thinking adult out there, that’s burning down a city.
