[NCAC] PRIVATE CENSORSHIP – FIGHTING SUPPRESSION OF SPEECH BY NON-GOVERNMENTAL ACTORS

Easy there, I'm not so sure about you either.

Just a thought, from a moderate to a moderate, why can't you find a more diverse group of conservative-to-libertarian thinkers and articles. It would be very cool if you or someone would. Jonah Goldberg was always thoughtful and entertaining, whether I agreed or not, but that's just one example from me personally...there have to be more out there. Expand our horizons. Please.

And for ****'s sake it does not need to be a dry boring blog post from a law professor. This is supposed to be, if not fun, at least a diversion from not-fun.

I do not do social media, I do get a decent amount of news from this very bbs, as I assume others do. An honest, actually honest from everyone, gumbo of ideas would be cool. And this goes for everyone.

 

Isn't Nigeria a governmental actor?

 

Just saying, wrong thread....

 

I would politely disagree. Twitter is not the actor committing censorship in this case, rather it is fighting a governmental actor.

 

What bother me is that there is so much focus on censorship from tech companies, but very little on censoring things such as critical race theory. It all seems very onesided.

 

Yes. Let the free market decide. That's the beauty of social media. It's free market dictating censorship. Capitalists should embrace it.

 

Then what's the need to censor it?

 

Right, but don't you think it's worrisome that on one hand, GOP lawmakers are working to censor what is taught in the classroom but on the other are working to protect conservative speech from censorship by tech companies?

 

Democratic Lawmakers are not forcing anything to be taught in the classrooms of course, so your point is lost on me.

In any case, so you are saying you are cool with GOP lawmakers censoring school content but not Twitter censoring GOP content? This would see to at least put an asterisk next to your moderate/independent self-label.