Tony buzbee filing lawsuit against Deshaun Watson? Hints at mistreating women

I'm going by what you've said and what I already know in general.

My math skills are top notch. That's why 6-figure careers are available at my disposal. But my hustle game is strong too. So there's even more options available. The same options I've already executed for 20+ years.

 

Right, yet everyone believes that Roger Clemens used and abused steroids...... rather than being a Hall of Famer and celebrated as the best pitcher in a hundred years, and being deeply involved in the game.... he is a pariah.

Rusty Hardin the best defense attorney in the world for a Houston jury short of Racehorse Haynes coming back from the dead. However, he cannot fix reputations or change public perception.

It is VERY unlikely Watson ever even has criminal charges against him..... and with the silver tongued devil representing him, he has a chance to beat civil charges..... but he his perception has likely changed forever and that is something that will not be fixed.

 

Lol. Plenty women are summoned to want me

 

Yeah well I have lots of flaws and personality disorders and baggage.

 

If the NFL doesn't ban Watson Watson WILL play football again. Michael Vick came back after going to PRISON.

That's what this thread is all about. Not Watson's reputation but Watson as a football player.

 

Sure, if you point is that Watson will play again, I believe he will as well..... however there will be consequences for the long term with Watson. He will likely be viewed different by people, he will have limited marketing opportunities and for the first time he is likely not going to be viewed as "the good guy".

 

I will bow to you expertise on if you think he actually has anything but to me it looks like he is trying to win on the court of public opinion and there is no way he can get a settlement.

I have never seen an attorney divulge that much play by play in a filing with this type of case especially a civil case but maybe I am wrong, it would seem that you would divulge this stuff in court for the shock value.

His going back and forth with using the Texans name and then not knowing the guy was not employed seems to be bush league as well as him saying he was working with the HPD and then when they disputed that using that random text.

My biggest issue is that this all seems rushed and overly sensational if he has the goods there would seem to be no reason to sensationalize these things. to me it seems a good lawyer holds his cards close to his vest.

Anyway it will all come out in the wash but it seems to be a Trump like tactic and he is just flooding the zone. (No pun intended)

 

Arguing perception is not a strong stance when you typically evoke the sentiment that women are victims.

This reinforces my first post in this thread. Women have plenty power over men, regardless of truth and validity.

Women in general are not victims. In fact, they're mostly the aggressors when dealing with men. Women know society will lean towards them and brad about the fact. That's why many situations like Deshaun is facing happen to begin with.

 

He is definitely trying to win the court of public opinion for a number of reasons. First, the jury will likely be made up of people watching what is going on. Second, he wants attention, all showmen do.

Rusty Hardin isn't saying much because he doesn't know what else is out there and there are still cases being filed.

In high profile cases usually this much dirt comes out. It isn't necessary for the purposes of filing the case but it does help shape public sentiment and it also brings attention to the attorney.

Those can be slips of the tongue because of arrogance, or he could be trying to shape public sentiment by being deceptive.

He wants the attention and his clients likely want him to get attention because it brings attention to their cases. Also, if you believe what the Complaint states, at least some of the victims want attention brought to what Watson did to them.

It is strategy...... John O'Quinn used to do the same thing, brought attention to himself which gave him the attention he craved and also helped his firm grow.

To be clear, I don't know what the outcome of this lawsuit will be, but from my perspective Watson is a loser regardless and the question is whether he will just lose in the forum or public opinion or if he will also lose the civil suit.

 

My wife ended up spending more time outside the house after retiring than when she was working.

As to your math skills, not sure how you get 20 years when I retired before 60 and my wife in her 40s.

 

Thanks Nook for your expertise, will the women need to come forward when this goes to trial? When does Rusty get to start talking to them or is that done in court only, is there a deposition or grand jury that takes place first?

 

So have been trolling this entire time or since you received so much backlash to your juvenile comments are, you trying to save face?

You were deadly serious yesterday now its all jokes.

Hmmm.

 

Stop being a ***** about it and you'll understand how 40-60 might construe 20 years.

So, give me exact numbers, simpleton. What exact years did it happen? Was it only 5 or 10 years?

Regardless, your wife quit first. And the homie @mightybosstone 's wife ended up part-time before he did.

I promise neither one of you made enough for your spouses to not work in the first place. But day's end, SHE stopped working when feasible.

 

Yeah, in general terms I do believe women that claim they are victims of sexual assault.... and the statistics support the position I take as well.

Right, that is why 15-20% of women have been raped or have been a victim of attempted rape.

LMFAO Women are mostly the aggressors in dealing with men?

Here is a pro tip........... perhaps your belief system is only attracting the very bottom of the barrel of women.

Perhaps you should question your masculinity if so many women are the aggressor with you.

Also, no there are so many situations like DeShaun Watson's because too many men lack self control.

 

My sentiment has remained the same.

Maybe your initial emotion has subsided, thus you can now see more clearly.

 

Consider that this guy is basically telling you that you treated the woman you love (and have loved for decades) too well and she didn't deserve it.

Then consider why he has not had positive experiences with women.

 

You suck at this.

Never seen a poster go from 60 to 0 so fast.

I still think your sentiments were DAF but at least you seemed to actually believe them but now its trolling and attacking posters and their wives.

Is this you?

 

LMFAO

 

On what planet or any circumstance is <20% deemed a large problem?

I can name some, but sexual assault isn't one of them.

The divorce rate is 52%. And 80% filed by black women in black relationships,

You wanna talk percentage? What percent of women are impregnated under a false pretense? (I'm on the pill, I can't have children, a condom with a hole in it, meat baster).

Don't respond to me unless you're willing to acknowledge things that really happen.

Seems your jaded mindframe can't equate what aggression is.

Women abuse with their tongues... the words they say. Women typically are better than men with words. They know it and brag about it, so it's not an accidental coincidence.

Besides that, women know in general the law and society is on their side when dealing with men (divorce, relationships, etc). Women can basically do whatever they want to men without legal repercussions.

The worse case legal scenario for any of Deshaun's "victims" regardless of validity is... "that mean man only won because he's rich.... you're still a princess".