1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. LIVE WATCH EVENT
    The NBA Draft is here! Come join Clutch in the ClutchFans Room Wednesday night at 6:30pm CT as we host the live online NBA Draft Watch Party. Who will the Rockets select at #3?

    NBA Draft - LIVE!

PJ Tucker traded to Milwaukee

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by dockerland, Mar 17, 2021.

  1. don grahamleone

    don grahamleone Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,402
    Likes Received:
    33,605
    Good thing your negativity isn't contagious. There may be people that agree with you, but they were negative people to start out with. The fact that you do not acknowledge the leverages that we did get is deplorable negativity. What in the world has happened to you? Everything alright in your world, bro?
     
  2. ashleyem

    ashleyem Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    7,786
    The argument that there is no difference between drafting in the 2nd round and late 1st round pick is absurd. We could have drafted Jokic instead of Nick Johnson if we had drafted a spot higher. And why should we be worried about Augustin’s contract? He’s still a very serviceable guard that could be flipped for more assets down the road. There is no big fish in the FA market this year and no one is signing here anyways. I am totally okay with taking on his contract. I am also intrigued by Wilson. On paper he really fits our need.
     
    #382 ashleyem, Mar 17, 2021
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2021
  3. mikenm268

    mikenm268 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2018
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    959
    I agree with you and the points you highlight, re lotto tickets. The Rockets didn’t get ‘nothing’ but I would argue what they did get was very little, and IMO, arguablely less than two middling 2nd round picks, which is what I thought they would get.
     
    ramotadab and D-rock like this.
  4. D-rock

    D-rock Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    40,743
    Likes Received:
    64,231
    How would you feel if Augustin moved to 3rd team for draft asset(s) or another young player?

     
    jch1911 likes this.
  5. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,934
    Likes Received:
    115,743
    If the Rockets flip Augustine for assets I will feel differently about the trade.

    I don’t think the Rockets screwed up this trade, I just don’t think they got what a lot of people think they got.
     
    luckyman76, Mr Woods, HP3 and 2 others like this.
  6. The Cat

    The Cat Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,798
    Likes Received:
    5,239
    The reason I like this deal is I think you can more easily use Pick 24 (or whatever it ends up being) as trade capital than you could two middling 2nds. If you compare the expected value in a vacuum, you can make that argument, but I think the trade capital of this path is better. We’ll see.
     
  7. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,934
    Likes Received:
    115,743
    If the Rockets find a way to move Augustine for assets I will like the trade.
     
    D-rock likes this.
  8. D-rock

    D-rock Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    40,743
    Likes Received:
    64,231
    High 2nd rounders are more valuable than bottom 5 first rounders due to contract flexibility.

    And the talent variance is very slight.

    In fact teams tend to reach at the bottom of the 1st forcing legit 1st rounders to fall to top of the 2nd.
     
  9. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,934
    Likes Received:
    115,743
    It isn’t negativity, it is reality. The Rockets did not trade PJ Tucker for a #1 as I have seen numerous times. The Rockets took on an additional contract obligation in exchange for moving up a handful of spots in the draft and moving the Bucks pick from 2022 to 2023.... I think the Rockets likely could have done that without Tucker...

    If you view that as negativity, that is on you. Maybe the Rockets draft a star at pick 25ish and I will gladly eat crow... but I am not going to lie and say it is some wonderful deal when in reality it is largely rearranging the deck chairs.
     
    luckyman76, ramotadab, HP3 and 2 others like this.
  10. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,358
    Likes Received:
    4,892
    That used to be the case, but I think late first rounders are now comfortably more valuable than early seconds.
     
    PiPdAdY33, Deuce, IvanLCPM and 9 others like this.
  11. Icehouse

    Icehouse Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2000
    Messages:
    13,481
    Likes Received:
    3,823
    You make it seem like moving up 7-8 spots in the draft, from round 2 to round 1, means nothing. In prior drafts we have struck out getting back into round one.
     
  12. ashleyem

    ashleyem Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    7,786
    We are not in position to sign any marquee free agent any time soon so why should we emphasize flexibility? For us it is all about drafting the right guy not contract, and moving up a few spots could make huge difference. Yes, we didn’t get a lot but really I didn’t expect a lot from a 36-year-old washed up veteran. Teams aren’t stupid.
     
  13. mikenm268

    mikenm268 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2018
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    959
    Daryl Morey is rolling over in his grave.
     
  14. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,934
    Likes Received:
    115,743
    A lot of it hinges on Augustine and the Rockets ability to move him. Taking on a contract that a team wants to move usually comes at a price.
     
    D-rock likes this.
  15. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,934
    Likes Received:
    115,743
    The Rockets didn’t get that for Tucker... they got that by taking on a contract the Bucks wanted to move and Tucker.
     
    D-rock likes this.
  16. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,934
    Likes Received:
    115,743
    The 2022 and 2023 picks have the same level of protection. I was wrong about the 2023 having 1-9 protection
     
  17. ashleyem

    ashleyem Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    7,786
    I absolutely agree! I like locking the rookie up for four years instead of getting Parsoned again.
     
  18. The Cat

    The Cat Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,798
    Likes Received:
    5,239
    I haven’t seen it, but yeah. Anyone suggesting they traded Tucker for a 1 is wrong.

    I’m just happy (within reason) because my expectation was Tucker for expiring salary (or into a TPE) and a 2nd. IMO, this is better than that.
     
  19. PhiSlammaJamma

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    28,931
    Likes Received:
    7,177
    We got nothing because frankly, he's worth nothing. The Bucks still lose though because PJ Tucker is not the answer. Nobody is really saying it, but Ante has to carry that team all by himself, and he's not enough. He needs a legit running mate. It's unfortunate, but his loyalty is going to sink him. Tucker makes them worse if you ask me. Their greatest strength is their length and Tucker makes them short. again.
     
    ramotadab and ashleyem like this.
  20. don grahamleone

    don grahamleone Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,402
    Likes Received:
    33,605
    The Rockets traded away a 1st round pick and a 2nd round pick for two 1st round picks. You ignore that. That's seeing only the negative.

    This was only slight improvement, but it was first round improvement and it was moved up a year. Our other first round pick is now from a highly coveted draft because of potential draft rule changes. PJ wasn't playing, Kuruks wasn't playing.. and we flipped them for two guys that will play basketball on the court for us in reality.

    It's like your kid went from finishing 6th in his race to 5th and you're telling him he didn't improve. The reality of how you are presenting is that it's negative and ignoring the facts about what changed.

    If we got 2 2nd rounders and traded all of our 2nds to move up into the first round, you'd be happy. So how are you choosing to ignore that fact? Up is up, man. Whether it's an inch or a foot, up is up.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now