He'd innocent, not because he didn't do anything to incite the deadly attack on our capital, but because he didn't "intend" the riot he incited "to get out of hand."...
TO :" I'm in the streets, Max seems almost BLACKER than you" this is the most real talk in this entire thread also implies the Stephen A is NOT in the streets but in an office TO is in the streets
"How the *New York Times* Writes Hit Pieces on Bloggers": https://200proofliberals.blogspot.com/2021/02/how-new-york-times-writes-hit-pieces-on.html Sunday, February 14, 2021 How the *New York Times* Writes Hit Pieces on Bloggers Blogger: "I disagree with David Duke's evil rotten racism, but since you asked me about him, yes, I agree with him that the Earth is indeed round. It's not like David Duke gets everything wrong." New York Times: "Blogger aligned himself with David Duke, well-known for his racism. Blogger said, 'It's not like [KKK leader] David Duke gets everything wrong." This is how the United States' newspaper of record writes nowadays. By Jason Brennan at February 14, 2021
What’s weird is when people only look for when the other team lies. And are fully capable of ignoring and never acknowledging when their team does. Going all the way to the point where they will argue that they are not lying and can’t accept it that indeed do. It’s a game which is why saying team fits perfectly. And I’ll go ahead and say it. It literally makes me and others better when they are capable of seeing when someone or anyone lies no matter if they agree with their ideology or not. Someone like Bobbythegreat would argue with their last breath with abject incapability of seeing their psychosis.
related "What The New York Times' Hit Piece on Slate Star Codex Says About Media Gatekeeping": https://reason.com/2021/02/15/what-...late-star-codex-says-about-media-gatekeeping/
