It's definitely in that arena - but I wouldn't think it crosses the line any more than having a Jesus inspired avatar or someone making reference to a political magazine from NY. To me the only overtly political avatar is Carl's.
All the avatars that "cross the line" into D&D territory need to be changed, in my opinion. I enjoy being able to have an avatar. I knew what I was going to have if it was ever allowed and it's the one I use. It would be a pity if after so many years of not having them that a few members took away the privilege from everyone else because they were too dense to realize what they were doing.
I don't think @ROXRAN 's avatar crosses the line though. His picture can't be assumed to be a gun rights statement. He could just be a lover of guns. If someone loves cupcakes, can they not have a cupcake as an avatar? He can argue that he just loves guns.
I had the terminator avatar for awhile, it's a robot sent from the future to destroy humanity. and yes I do feel like wish to terminator many accounts on clutchfans for not being pure rockets fans or insulting 99ers or trolling without paying a dime to the site. avatars don't destroy people, people destroy people
Harrison Ford is a life-long Democrat and activist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Ford#Activism What do we do for people who are offended by pictures of Harrison Ford? asking for a friend.
Isn't Avatar a movie about a bunch of Gringos trying to steal resources from LatinX aliens with a giant tree? @Os Trigonum
Did you know if you put Os and tinman on ignore, roughly a third of their threads disappear from the first page and almost half of their threads in page 2 are just gone like they never even existed. Maybe they'd just continue to gaslight each other with their niche boomer humor but no one else else would be the wiser. In a way the ignore function is like vaccinating yourself from ridiculously stupid threads filled with vapid opinions that aren't even their own.
