1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Rockets cut Isaiah Hartenstein

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Carl Herrera, Jun 23, 2020.

  1. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,221
    Likes Received:
    14,662
    I think you meant isn't instead of is really a good switch defender at all.
     
    HP3, D-rock and Nook like this.
  2. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,717
    Likes Received:
    132,057
    Correct, he isn't a good switch defender.
     
    HP3, D-rock and saleem like this.
  3. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,181
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    When's the last time Rudy Gobert got past the 2nd round?
     
    HP3 and MettaWorldPete like this.
  4. CXbby

    CXbby Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2002
    Messages:
    9,081
    Likes Received:
    11,967
    Who cares? They have value. Just because they don't have a jump shot doesn't change that. Try to keep up. Hartenstein had value. His value is going to go up this year because he's getting an opportunity. You can do what you want with that value like flipping him to another team, instead of dumping him for nothing.
     
    roslolian and fattz like this.
  5. fattz

    fattz Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    5,623
    Likes Received:
    5,367
    A big body with some game for the end of a rotation on a rookie contract. (Could have used that last game). IMO, it’s save to say cutting him was a mistake. The size of it’s wrongness is more than debatable. I will say this , IMO, if he was on the team we would be 1 and 0 at this moment. We were being bullied in the low post and coaching (now) with Hartinstien’s talent would have made the difference in this one game. (Cousins currently has this role but was out).


    Here is were my thoughts are:
    Hartinstien & GG
    OR
    Clemons and Thomas
     
    MettaWorldPete and roslolian like this.
  6. MrButtocks

    MrButtocks Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,535
    Likes Received:
    5,758
    I wish we had given Hartenstein a chance last season, but that ship has sailed. He still would never have gotten into the rotation this season. Wood is our starting center now and Cousins is the primary backup, both of them are much more talented than him and can space the floor. It would be nice to have him as injury insurance for Cousins, but we don't even have a backup PG right now. I'm much more concerned about that than third string center.
     
  7. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,896
    Likes Received:
    20,042
    The other dude talking about value is right. I can understand if Hartenstein signed for some ridiculous amount but he signed for 1.6M a year. That is still great value for a player of his caliber regardless whether he can hit a J or not.

    Even as a lob target or just 5 hard fouls or 5 mins of rest for Wood and Cousins, Harty would've outplayed that salary.

    It was dumb to cut him and when the Rox did, they should have signed him in FA immediately.

    I'm not gonna lose sleep on a 3rd string center making 1.6M, but at the same time a mistake is a mistake. It all adds up.
     
    MettaWorldPete likes this.
  8. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,896
    Likes Received:
    20,042
    You need 3 at ever position. For pg you can always have sgs be the pg, but for center it should mostly be a dedicated dude.
     
  9. MrButtocks

    MrButtocks Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,535
    Likes Received:
    5,758
    How many championship teams have three dedicated centers nowadays? Some barely have two. More teams have PF playing center than have SGs playing point. The Lakers playing Harrell at primary backup center while having two dedicated point guards.
     
  10. DM'sVP

    DM'sVP Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    1,459
    Get ready for the Hartenstien revenge game tonight. It’s totally possible that he goes 20 and 10 while shutting down Wood. I’ll say it again, CUTTING HARTENSTIEN WAS A MISTAKE!

    I’m starting to see Wood more and more as a PF and not a C. I think Hartenstien would look great with C-Wood. If the Rockets would’ve cut Clemons instead of Hartenstien to sign Nwaba then they would have had room to keep Gerald too. Damn it!
     
    TEXNIFICENT and cmoak1982 like this.
  11. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,181
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    How did you know they didn't try to move him?
     
    HP3 likes this.
  12. MrButtocks

    MrButtocks Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,535
    Likes Received:
    5,758
    Morey's long history of poor asset management. /s
     
    HP3 likes this.
  13. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,896
    Likes Received:
    20,042
    At 1.6M there is literally no harm at getting a backup center. You got big teams like Portland, Lakers or Denver a backup is def needed in case Cousins goes down for a couple of games.
     
    TEXNIFICENT and cmoak1982 like this.
  14. MrButtocks

    MrButtocks Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,535
    Likes Received:
    5,758
    We hardcapped ourselves to get Wood so $1.6M hurts. We can't even afford to sign Gerald Green to the minimum because of it. If Cousins were our starting center we'd probably need to make backup center a priority, but he's not. With injury prone Wall being our starter a backup PG is a far more pressing priority.
     
    HP3 likes this.
  15. TimDuncanDonaut

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Messages:
    15,234
    Likes Received:
    36,370
    Should have kept iHart over Clemonade.
     
    seemoreroyals likes this.
  16. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,092
    Likes Received:
    29,513
    I blame Westbrook and whoever wanted to trade for him. We got rid of all bigs who could not shoot outside because we needed to hide Westbrook's weakness. I thought it wasn't very wise to shape your team for the benefit of your second option, and your second option was not helping your first option.
     
  17. Poonwalker

    Poonwalker Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2019
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    867
    Definitely should have kept him, he hustles on defense, he is making good passes and even has a decent pick and roll game going. I knew at the time that was a bad decision.
     
  18. HP3

    HP3 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2018
    Messages:
    24,359
    Likes Received:
    33,850
    LIterally ignored his bad games. LOL. These are great for the minutes he got. I dont want to hear it. He was never as good as you made him out to be and he was no difference maker.
     
  19. HP3

    HP3 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2018
    Messages:
    24,359
    Likes Received:
    33,850
    This is flat out not true. Holy crap. Do I have to post that article again LOL.
     
  20. Tom Bombadillo

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    29,091
    Likes Received:
    23,991
    About to get completely toasted in the pick and roll tonight.
     
    HP3 likes this.

Share This Page