What dont i know? Bro You didn't know that Crenshaw said her claims from their SEAL days were frivolous So stop with the i dont know ish. So go read the 68 pages. Maybe they explain how someone can be sexually assaulted in a public cafeteria. I just don't believe that dumb ish so im not wasting the time THE POLICE ALREADY DID SO
You don't want to read any of the report that talks about the subject you keep posting about that you don't know anything about because you don't want to waste your time. LOL Classic.
The police dismissed it. You think she got assaulted at the coke machine? What is the difference dumbass between you or me not reading it? You can't insult someone for the same **** and you were wrong yesterday. Good lord thick headed mofo
Yet you wrote this... Maybe they explain how someone can be sexually assaulted in a public cafeteria. I just don't believe that dumb ish so im not wasting the time So clearly you are wasting your time. Based on what you have chosen to read and believe, you have already decided she wasn't sexually assaulted so if anyone discusses anything to the contrary you immediately proclaim they are wrong. So... why start this thread?
Actually as ive already written twice since you so damn good at following what i wriite is i wanted to started on how sexual assault claims are handled And you have a lot of damn nerver oh defender of Carl Herrera thread starting
Its in the o.p. only so much room in title. Remember you making fun of me for that? Now gon defend some more stupid ass carl herrera original posrs. Remember?
First... where did I make fun of you for the long title? I may have suggested you shorten it, but pretty sure I didn't "make fun" of you. Second... if you were taking about the Carl thread which discussed the President's excursion around the block when he was in the hospital, you were the only poster in that entire thread that didn't realize it was a different topic Third... my title suggestion is shorter than the title you wrote Fourth... why is it necessary to include any reference to Crenshaw for a general sexual assault handling topic? Fifth... did you actuality get this far? On multiple occasions (and as recently as yesterday) you have admitted only reading the first part of a post and then ASSuming (your word and emphasis) the rest...
So you admonish me for putting something in the o.p. and not the title but defend Herrera not putting the topic anyfuqingwhere and expecting someome to know the topic? Gon wit stupid **** old man. No defense
@bobrek And old man you forgot making fun of title before helpful suggestions. But really you act like an obsessed old man. I answered why start a separate thread and answered why the handling of sexual assault isnt in title. No way to shorten that subject. Thats what o.p.'s are for oh defender of carl herrera stupid ass original posts Lot of nerve old man
