trump unfit and unknown long term health risks mean biden is only choice

Calm down there libby, I didn’t say anything about the system. I said what her platform is.
Maybe that public school reading comprehension you have needs a systemic overhaul?
Before calling someone uneducated or dumb, try reading first.

 

Nope. My reading comprehension is perfectly fine.

Your premise: Education needs to be handled more by the state and local government and not by feds.

My premise: you're wrong as we already have a system that is nearly 95% reliant on state and local funding which results in vast inequality, here is data that shows you are facing 180 degrees from reality.

Your retort: I didn't say that.

Again, don't have strong opinions on subjects you have little intellectual curiosity about. The world would be better off of if people heeded that.

 

So again, Jo is another unpragamtic Libertarian who doesn't research the actual issues and just touts libetarian platitudes.

"Eliminate the department of education"

Libertarian: "ohh fancy. She'd make a great president".

 

My premise? You have no idea what you are saying. I literally said her wants/thoughts on policy.
No where did I discuss what my thoughts were.

The problem with most of you liberals is this right here. You think everyone should toe the line of their political party with no critical thinking, I’m sorry but most people don’t fit neatly in that box.
You’re having an argument with yourself, filling in perceived responses that never happened.
But you do you bud.

 

Simpleton

 

You literally defended her policy position of "eliminate the department of education" with "she wants the power to go back to the state and local government" implying you support that position as your comments before expressed her as your desired president. The rational implication is you are defending her position and I'm explaining why her and you are horribly wrong.

You don't want a discussion. Not once in this back and forth poo flinging have you addressed any of the content of my claims. All you've done is turned this into a meta poo flinging contest because you understand that you probably don't have the knowledge or actual facts on your side.

 

Exactly. You can't defend her policy position of "eliminate the department of education" besides "she wants the power to go back to the states and local government". That is the extent of all the knowledge you have on this position and you are adement about defending it. Why?

It seems like a 3 party system will still have folks attach to candidates like a cult of personality

 

Lmao, just because you want back and forth doesn’t mean I do. You brought up her after I said Jojo, I don’t have to discuss anything with you. You don’t mean anything to me and trying to convince you to change is a moot point.

 

Ability and choice are two different things. I choose not to go over policy with you, reading your history there isn’t a reason to try.

 

Lol you are pathetic. I'm not forcing you to debate me. Any time you can just... Not reply.

You are the one here in "Debate and discussion". I'm sorry that I assumed you want to debate. Now stop replying if you have nothing to debate with besides meta bullshit about my reading comprehension.

 

I don't think that's the reason. I think the reason is you haven't put any more thought into this subject matter besides "schools need to be more dependent on the state and local government". You don't know the current paradigm of federal vs state vs local funding nor do you understand the impacts. All you care about is knowing that is the Libetarian policy and you think Libertarians are cool.

 

You quoted me, I didn’t say anything to you. Move around if you don’t like what I say.

 

Yes we are free to quote each other. The thing is I'm not going to double speak and say I don't want to debate and then keep on replying to someone like a gossipy teenager.

 

You’re right, I don’t know what I’m talking about. You’re smarter than me.

Do you feel better now?

 

Once again, you replied to me.

 

No you don't and stop being confident in subject matter you obviously don't care about as this stuff about who finds who in public education is pretty common knowledge and you and Jo are 180 degrees in the opposite direct of reality.

 

I do have to wonder what Trump would be saying at his rallies if it was Joe and Jill who got the coronavirus. Somehow, I don't think he would be taking the high road because that's just who he is.

 

And once again, that is the nature of a message board. A sincere person who thinks "I'm not up for a debate with this person" would just not reply. You want to debate. It's obvious but you understand that you are lacking knowledge in this subject matter and this deflect with "lol I don't want to debate you because reasons...".

Your diction and recent posting history in this thread obviously suggests you want to debate.

 

Ok, I don’t know what I’m talking about (even though you have no idea what my stance is)
You’re a typical close minded, stereotyping liberal.
If you are in education I truly feel sorry for anyone under your tutelage.

 

Maybe stop reading too much into things?
I’ve only responded to your messages, not initiate conversation with you. So either you can stop or we’ll continue the back and forth.