Smh this thread is brutal. Is there a single republican here that is not a parody account or complete jokeshop ? Wow
How did he lie if that's not what he actually said? Does this mean, then, that you are lying? We throw 'lying' around a lot, almost always politically. ie, we are extremely willing and effusive in saying someone from the opposite political stance is 'lying'...but all too willing to accept the very same types of statements from those we politically support.
Carlson doesn't say the NYT is going to print his address. He said they are going to announce the neighborhood he lives in and show a picture of his house (which is just as bad as showing his address). The NYT does not deny this when they obviously could. Instead they refute a claim Carlson doesn't make.
So true now. Someone on fox news or facebook tells a ridiculous and obvious lie. trump supporter here sees it, gets a boner about "owning the libs" and posts it here. Its immediately proven to be a ridiculous lie. trump supporter will still defend it, despite being proven wrong, then move on to the next ridiculous and proven false thing. Again, just like trump, telling the truth is now no longer important, in fact, lying has become an acceptable and even desirable as a means to the end.
Cmon dude you cant be serious. So now it's "going to" ? Anyone can say anyone was "going to" You were "going to" rape babies. How about trump "not going to accept the election"..."Going to" nuke nk Etc etc laundry list
you didn't understand what i wrote at all. It went right past you. Just out of curiosity, do you find it odd the NYT doesn't deny taking pictures of Carlson's house? or that the reporter and photographer are assigned to dox Carlson?
Thanks you for proving my point. carlson's claim "they plan to". The title of this thread: "NYT to print Tucker Carlson’s address....again?!" The Times didn't "dox" carlson, fox news did years ago. And the NYT clearly said they didn't, nor have plans to. So... unless you have some sort of Minority Report future crimes vision, or you see its perfectly acceptable to accuse someone of something they haven't done and have no plans to commit... you are simply supporting carlson's blatant effort to deflect attention from the harassment accusations.
If you want to refute the thread title, then go ahead. It doesn't refute what Carlson said and neither does the NYT. Instead they refute some other claim which is basically admitting guilt.
Just out of curiosity how do you defend the indefensible? Im actually impressed with your ridiculousness. It went right past me yet in your edit you just did you arent even trying to say anything about "going to" just gloss past what you just said. Lol classic Are you a serious poster? Smh And yes any journalist and reputable news organization would have address and this sort of info. This is journalism 101. Are you outraged about fox actually doxxing tucker? "Going to" vs "actually did" Lol Again you cant be serious. Take the L man and move on. Wow.
Speaking as a soccer player, Carlson would get his ass kicked all over the field. You just know he's a whiny b**** who would flop and cry.
Your argument that Tucker should wait until his home has been made public by NYT to say anything, is stupid on its face and didn't warrant a counter argument but i'll oblige. If he knows the NYT is taking pictures of his house and writing up the story, why wait? the NYT doesn't deny they are doing this and instead deny other strawmen. If Tucker manages to discourage the behavior then good for him, he gets to stay safely at his current home.
Then OP lied, when he stated that Carlson said the NYT has published his address in the past. Nah, Democrat politicians lie...... just in recent history not as often as Republicans..... go back a bit and Democrats lied more often.... Bill Clinton lied... the problem is that the current GOP has turned lying into a sport.
So, now if they never identify his location then he can successfully boast that he made them change their mind even if they never planned to. He will come across as the hero conservative who made the big, bad liberal rag back down.
All the new York times has to do is say 'we never assigned a photographer to take pictures of Tucker's house and we never assigned a reporter to out the neighborhood Tucker lives in' . Tucker can then refute their claims. Again, The New York Times is not denying the story only you posters are.
trump defenders always find their safe zones. Usually associated with the so-called "culture wars". This is important to them since they know they have surrendered any claim on true moral, economic, or legal hills that in the past they staked their flag on. Thanks to their support of trump... its all they have left.