Russia Paid Bounties to Murder US Troops, Trump Lets Them

There were a couple but will start with post #218. You claimed liberals want WWIII because of it.

You are being dishonest, and are turning out to be a waste of time in this thread.

 

I find it funny to see two accounts that have obviously been hacked arguing against each other. Too funny

 

So if it is true, what is Trump doing now? What steps is he taking to hold Russia accountable?

Also, why is Trump unable to run a Whitehouse where he gets the briefings? All of his predecessors were able to get this kind of information.

This (doubtful) explanation doesn't make things better for Trump.

Can you answer the questions?

 

Oh I see. So the administration was just not competent enough to know what is going on. Thats much better!

 

Name three sources for news you consider reliable.

 

Wow this thread really took off and not in the direction I expected...

I've skimmed through the threads since page 2 and this post particularly stood out.

Why are you so determined to downplay and deny anything regarding Trump and Russians? This seems to be a pattern in this thread and in many posts you've made in this forum the last few years.

I can understand questioning the issue of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign and even the Mueller Report. It is a complicated scandal and even as someone who does accept the evidence I can agree there are grey areas and areas where things can be interpreted a different way. This issue though doesn't have anything to directly with the 2016 election. It is specifically about Russia, which is still universally acknowledged as a strategic rival even if not an outright enemy, engaging in behavior detrimental to the US yet in your post you seem unwilling to even acknowledge that. Is this because you were so bothered by the Russian election interference that you feel now you have to challenge everything negative relating to Russia and specifically regarding Trump?

I completely admit I haven't read all of your posts for the last few years and you are welcome to point out were you haven't defended Russia. I'm making this as an observation from this thread and to several other posts I've seen you make.

 

I can believe this. I can also believe that it was included in a PDB and Trump didn't read or else he forgot about it.

 

InfoWars Zerohedge and OANN. Fox News if you want a liberal spin.

 

Sanctions levied by the Obama administration were extremely successful. I did not like some parts of Obama’s foreign policy but he did well on the sanctions.

 

With this President anything is possible but I personally believe they told him and he shrugged and did nothing.

 

It is no bias to follow the reports of established journalists and researchers who adhere to the principles of journalistic integrity, rather than op-ed and "entertainment news" you get from the likes of Fox News, Breitbart, and their ilk. Perhaps you aren't familiar with established journalistic principles, but journalists worthy of the title are drilled in process requiring credible sources and credible confirmation. Watch the movie All the President's Men and see the criteria Woodward and Bernstein had to meet in order to print the information they discovered of the Watergate coverup.

 

Delete

 

That was in response to the election loss and everything in total which I wrote in that post. It was sarcasm also which I'm sure you guys don't want WWIII.

 

Because there is nothing going on in Afghanistan bro. Is that not hard to understand? There is no confirmation of. bounty killings before and no casualties since

Trump bombed Russia in Syria. You know the other **** hole we left to liberal dismay because of Kurds or whatever

 

That doesn't really answer my question..

Also your dismissal of one of our most loyal allies, the Kurds is troubling...

 

Allies. Ally doing what? Let us camp their to help topple Saddam their enemy? That's why we should stay in Syria? Did we really not bomb Russians there? We should stay and let Russian tension escalate?

Three questions for you

 

Saddam?

 

There are only poisons here. Denial and double down might be the best strategy, as usual. That would at least allow the cult something to rationalize with and it’s only uphill from that baseline.

 

Let me be perfectly clear. I don't give a damn about this because I don't give a damn about the middle east. If a casualty happens cause then I would care

We frack now. Thanks for the oil . We good

Yes that's the last thing we "needed " I didn't support iraq war but in terms of alliance that was their worth

 

You know where Putin gets money. Supplying 30% of Europe's gas

None of this stupidity matters
You wanna stop Putin? Invest in liquified natural gas. Cut him off at the pocket book