two years after it happened is reasonable but if you want closer, read her coworkers statement (the one i quoted for you). The reason individuals care about whether she told others around the time of the event is to contradict the argument 'why now?' . She can contradict that claim. No, but just to be clear, I wouldn't be shocked at all if she was lying.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/01/opinions/biden-tara-reade-allegations-2008-vetting-axelrod/index.html Point made: Biden was VETTED for VP by the Obama team. Nothing came up....Tara Reade's name wasn't mentioned. If there was complaint filed, it would have came up in that vetting.
To me, it's mind boggling that she didn't keep a copy of the complaint she filed saying that a sitting US Senator penetrated her with his fingers.
What amazes me is it took a month for Democrats and the mainstream media to collude to get their stories in sync before they went public. I would have thought 1-2 weeks would have been long enough. I suppose they needed that time to destroy those documents that proved creepy Joe’s guilt. Now all we will have is he said/she said.
im not sure this is a real question. Isn’t it conventional wisdom that Hillary snatched defeat from the jaws of victory by ignoring the swing states completely, by her deplorable comment, by her general unlikability.
NY Times Editorial Board now calling for an investigation into Biden. They are paving the way for Hillary. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/...-on-dnc-to-investigate-tara-reade-allegations The New York Times editorial board is calling on the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to investigate Tara Reade's sexual assault allegations against former Vice President Joe Biden. “His campaign, and his party, have a duty to assure the public that the accusations are being taken seriously,” the editorial board wrote in an editorial published Friday evening. “The Democratic National Committee should move to investigate the matter swiftly and thoroughly, with the full cooperation of the Biden campaign.”
NYT: Doesn't call for investigation TJ: MASS DNC CONSPIRACY!!!! NYT: Calls for investigation TJ: MASS DNC CONSPIRACY!!!!
I can think of a million reasons why some one wouldn't have a piece of paper 27 years old regardless of how important u think it is.
I have no idea what she was thinking, but filing a report which amounted to a felony committed by a sitting US Senator is something I would make multiple copies of. It's not some old receipt or warranty we are discussing.
I don't think she quite understood what she was asking and just piggybacked on what one of the guest thought was lacking in his statement. I thought his confusion was because he did not understand why there would need to be a search of those documents. Yes it was a pertinent question but she became belligerent when she did not get the answer she wanted and her talking about transparency did not make much sense concerning those documents IMO.
So you think the DNC can do a more thorough investigation than the many news sources on it and Obama's vetting team? You don't think Fox news is tourning over every rock? I don't know what the editorial board thinks the DNC can do that there own investigators cannot, it seems like virtue signalling.
This would be true except for the fact that she kept all of her service records that long and have made them available.
