It also sort of answers the questions that alot of people have had about why NYC. I've heard theories about air circulation in high rises, etc. Kinda puts alot of those theories to bed. Also helps to think about other metro areas that'll be at high risk. I worry about Chicago mostly. Philly, and Boston too. Hard to say what Texas will be hit with. We have some space between humans in our daily lives being a auto transit state, but we do have ALOT of stupidity. We also have to rely on Wal Mart, Target etc. for our supplies and groceries. Will WalMart and Target become NY Subway lite spreaders in our communities? That's probably my biggest concern. I think we REALLY need to re-think supply runs, and prepare for a better way to manage grocery runs. It seems as though alot of these cities will be about 2 weeks behind NYC. So it shouldn't take too long for us to really start to see what other cities are about to get hit. Hope other cities like Chicago took measures weeks ago when NYC started getting hit hard.
Instead of insulting people, you need to take a dose of humility and understand that the word "approval" carries a great deal of significance when it comes to drugs. To be categorized as having FDA approval means a drug has gone through clinical trials and been reviewed for approval. It's a rigorous process. To say the FDA has approved x for y usage is a big statement that should not be made in this case. That is his point.
Funny you say I am insulting someone who is essentially calling me a liar. I reject that calling a liar who makes up claims about me a liar is an insult, and rather an accurate portrayal of their character. Also to understand the article quoted and linked to one must read past what one wants to argue against. Now I understand his point but it's misrepresenting me and my position and it's misrepresenting the position of that article. It is intellecually dishonest and going beyond what is reasonable. The article clearly states three times in what way it was approved and Okayed. It was said in the damn headline right off the bat. I didn't say it was FDA approved like he claims and when I posted that link I didn't think "hey people will think this means 100% FDA approved." If you or Biina are too dumb to realize what the article said, that's on ya'll but ya'll were not so I don't think other people will think that. So I don't see a problem. The word approve was NEVER used in the way Biina are describing and the claim is one of technical semantic. I am aware of the "WEIGHT" of the word but that's a very far reaching argument that isn't applicable because the word was not used in that way. It was clearly shown in the headline and in the article that this was not what they were talking about. I don't accept the angle being pushed because it's simply a false narrative and a stretch being used to gain a technical "win" to make Biina feel less sore about being horribly wrong and being called out for lying.
Fresh on the heels of his successful mideast peace plan, trump has son-in-law jared as a "pivotal figure" on the "private enterprise" team focusing on Coronavirus.
If anybody is lying, it is you by trying to make Chloroquine seem more effective than has actually been a scientifically established. That MA doc was referring to people like you, who misinform others and try to make it seem like the drug has been approved. Wonder why you can't simply accept and state unequivocally that the drug has not been approved? BTW there is no such thing as 'approved for emergency use'. That is simply a construct of the writer which you have coopted for your purpose. EUA is used to allow unapproved usage when no approved drug exist. The 'Emergency' is the context for invoking the authorization (e.g. pandemic or terrorist attack) and not the medical condition of the patient.
As the first economic impacts of the coronavirus took hold, new benefit claims soared by 70,000 three weeks ago, hit a record-shattering 3.28 million two weeks ago, and last week the Labor Department announced today, rocketed another 6.65 million.
Meanwhile in LA: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-in...hip-port-los-angeles-coronavirus-crisis-feds/ A conspiracy fueled dumbass intentionally derailed a train shipment, on purpose, because he feared the waiting hospital ship was part of a jade helm like government takeover. AM radio literally costs lives in a crisis. If you wrote this in a novel, I would say it’s a little crazy, but ‘Murica!
no the FDA never said it can be used just yet Only thing FDA said it should start being stockpiled that's it
Could be incorrect but seems extremely partisan with the (R) suffixes. Dude asked which governors not what party they were in?
- UT Austin closed door on the 3/13 when the president wife tested positive. Go home and be responsible. - Group of ~70 took flight to their corona party on the 14th
I think it is important if those governors based their decisions to not announce mandatory stay-in-place edicts because of their party affiliation. Or, like the Governor of Georgia, kemp, (r), because he followed trump. Interesting that it was the first thing you noticed though. Do you think it was simply a coincidence that every one was a republican?
He has been a bit unclear... and to be honest, don't know if there is some legal process that was or was not done to make it legal... Gov. Abbott clarifies order, saying it ‘requires all Texans to stay at home’ https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/article/Gov-Abbott-clarifies-order-saying-it-15172996.php
So there is but he's not going to say it out loud because of all of the Jade Helm idiots on the right.
