Again. Speak your mind and do your thing. All good. You’re not understanding my points about indecisiveness and judgment for some reason with regard to her. And I’m arguing an impeachment vote is arguably the biggest duty for a member of Congress because of its importance. There is likely no more consequential decision that particular member of Congress will have to judge. I’m not sure how, based upon what I said, you concluded otherwise. No, I’m not implying it should be a partisan mechanism to uncut members of the opposing party.
and her 4th quarter fundraising was up from her 3rd quarter: https://www.axios.com/tulsi-gabbard...-q4-cc030f14-b862-4a07-a41b-2376cefb25af.html
I hypothesize that her bump in 4th quarter fundraising is due to her vote of "present" on impeachment
Still polling low and behind Mayor Pete in polling and fundraising. So her publicly stunt helped delay the inevitable? Who wants to sig bet that Tulsi ends up as conservative pundit?
Tulsi loves drone strikes. Incressing them exponentially is the core of her "anti-terrorism" strategy. The "anti war" label is slightly off. She is very much against risking American soldiers lives on the ground, but she loves the idea of standing off and killing as many maybe "terrorists" as possible. That was the logic of her pro-Assad stance until it became untenable - Assad was barrel bombing terrorists so we should stay out of it.
Did you actually read the article? The state of play: The haul is up slightly from the $3 million she raised in the third quarter. The total includes $1.2 million raised in December alone, surpassing the campaign's $1 million goal for the final month of the year. Do better my dude.
She’s got to win at something, right? You know, since she’s hated in her own district and can’t run for re-election, and clearly this whole President thing isn’t going to happen.
With the support of people like Joe Rogan, her looks, and her non aggression stance with other countries. She will probably be just fine.
