Robert Mueller, Former F.B.I. Director, Is Named Special Counsel for Russia Investigation

https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2019/04/climates-uncertainty-principle/

 

I was about to post the same thing, but you beat me to it, as usual. ;-)

Of course, Os will find something online that calls them all dunces or Democrats or both. Perhaps he should spend as much time delving into why these prosecutors, in their hundreds, signed on to this letter, with more added everyday. He might consider the fact that they care about their country and are disturbed by the contents of the Mueller Report and the actions of the president he supports. As I recall, and I was around at the time, a lot of Republicans continued to support Nixon, come hell or high water. Then a funny thing happened. The evidence became so overwhelming that not only did they change their minds, some of them became leaders in bringing Nixon down.

 

the guy does legal ethics for a living and teaches continuing ed for lawyers on the subject of legal and professional ethics. if you can't handle the idea of a "different perspective" then that's fine. move on, skip it, put me on ignore. But that different perspective is out there.

 

I’m not simply addressing what you posted, Os. I have to admit that you have done a good job of finding numerous sources supporting your position with regard to trump, the Mueller Report, etc. What I’m suggesting is that you delve further into why these men and women signed on to this letter, with more added everyday. I also posted an example of Republicans, and folks who simply supported Nixon, who clung to their guy and continued to support the president, until the evidence was so overwhelming that they could no longer do so. That is a parallel worth noting.

 

fair enough

 

Trump weighing whether to order Justice Department to block Mueller from testifying

 

Trump triggering the leftists, yet again. Any of these people who do not realize this is happening at this point are clearly no where near as smart as they like to think that they are.

 

4D chess....

Whatever happened to #totalexoneration....

 

That was him triggering you guys, yet again.

It is not strictly possible to be exonerated from a matter in which no charges are brought. Now if he had been charged and tried and found innocent, then he would have been exonerated. But as we all know now, he was falsely accused and the investigation targeted at him was a politically contrived and motivated fraud.

By continuing to trigger you guys like this on almost a daily basis, he is playing chess, while the people on your side poop their panties on worldwide television and act out like petulant children that have just finished getting their bare bottoms spanked.

Democrat leftists are apparently so incapable of self control and self evaluation that they do not realize that as bad as Trump looks sometimes, the Democrat leftist look far worse when they act this way and continue on with this pathologically dishonest and out of control behavior.

Keep it up. You guys do not seem to realize it, but you are your own worst enemy.

 

Just curious, when Mueller is called to testify and he is asked if Trump would have been indicted if he wasn't president, are you gonna drop this falsely accused nonsense?

 

Mueller already stated that his refusal to bring charges on obstruction was in no way determined by any restrictions related to Trump being president. I suspect you already knew that, however.

 

That wasn't an answer to my question.

 

Yet another dodge by trump to avoid complying with congressional oversight...

1. Congress followed the law in requesting the tax returns
2. Congress does not need to prove "legislative purpose" to request these tax returns
3. The excuse "the tax returns are under audit" actually give congress more reason to want to see them
4. The excuse "setting precedence" is ridiculous since trump broke precedence not providing his returns
5. The excuse "doing it to embarrass trump" because his politics differ" is ridiculous since the founding fathers set congressional oversight.

Mnuchin rejects Democrats' demand for Trump's tax returns, citing DOJ advice

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mnuchi...ent-after-democrats-demand-citing-doj-advice/

 

The attorney general of the United States has stated that Trump was falsely accused based on the contents of the Mueller investigation. Barr is, or at least was, Mueller's boss. Mueller had a chance to recommend charges on obstruction and did not do so. Nobody blocked him or stopped him. If Mueller were to testify now that such charges are actually warranted, then he will ruin himself at that very moment.

 

So, if such testimony were to occur, you are telling me you would NOT believe Mueller. Is that your answer?

 

This is silly. Let me know when he gives such testimony - if he gives testimony at all. Until then, you are just pulling stuff out of your rear end.

 

There is nothing silly about this and its a pretty easy question to answer. Not sure what you are afraid of.

 

Wow... trump's appointee (who has been acting as his personal attorney) said what?

And Mueller? Lets take a look...

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/04/what-the-mueller-report-says-about-obstruction/

 

Lol... you seemed triggered now! I got you to spend time crafting a response to my quip.

Living rent free baby! Did not read!