Robert Mueller, Former F.B.I. Director, Is Named Special Counsel for Russia Investigation

How did he not obstruct.

 

He obstructed their attempted coup. And they are out of their minds about that.

 

[Fox News] Judge Andrew Napolitano: Did President Trump obstruct justice?

 

LOL

The Democrats attempted a coup by having a Republican recuse himself, his Republican deputy appoint a Republican special prosecutor that gave the Republican president every benefit of the doubt and courtesy in his final report.

It's no wonder you don't like Democrats. Nobody should vote for anyone that is as inept as they are in your fantasy land.

 

This is ridiculous rambling. Why don't you pick one out that you feel is obstruction?

 

Maybe you’ll feel better hearing from one of your own:

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Did President Trump obstruct justice?
https://news.yahoo.com/fox-news-jud...shows-trump-obstructed-justice-001202876.html

 

Lol. Well I just posted the article again... maybe you missed it while you were rambling....Lol.

How about you pick one and debate that? If you can.

 

Nepolitano is a devout "Never Trumper" who has made his name over the last 2+ years making provocative anti-Trump pronouncements.

Next.

 

he's not one of my own. Despise Napolitano and think hes moron.

 

http://time.com/5573521/donald-trump-obstruction-justice/

 

A devout conservative too.

Hey what happened to Brexit, did they leave? Lol.

 

lol

First example in your article ' Trump asked FBI Director James Comey for loyalty ' .

haha. you actually posted this ****.

 

You aren’t conservative?

So what do disagree with in his OP ED? You pick one his statements and let’s debate it.... if you can.

 

You aren’t conservative?

So what do disagree with in his OP ED? You pick one his statements and let’s debate it.... if you can.

 

I dont share his beliefs. call those beliefs whatever you want.

Sure. The one I hear get the most play on this board is that Trump tried to fire Mueller. This statements makes no sense as the president doesn't try. He either does it or doesn't.

 

I think you are a little confused about the law and the concept of "intent"

 

Maybe it’s time to stop watching lefty FoxNews then. Just read Facebook memes and Sputnik articles then for your political education. I’m sure you’ll get an objective view of reality that way.

 

Lol.... how about you keep reading instead of just stopping?

How about how Trump asked intel officials to clear:

What he did: Trump asked Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, CIA Director Mike Pompeo, NSA Director Mike Rogers and Comey to state publicly that no link existed between him and Russia.

“In the weeks following Comey’s March 20, 2017 testimony, the President repeatedly asked intelligence community officials to push back publicly on any suggestion that the President had a connection to the Russian election-interference effort…According to Coast, the President asked them whether they could publicly say that no link existed between him and Russia…The President also said that the news stories linking him with Russia were not true and asked Rogers if he could do anything to refute the stories…The President asked Comey what could be done to ‘lift the cloud.’”

 

why would i after that? If thats the bar then the article is moronic.

 

This is a point made by John Hinderaker at the PowerLine blog:

First, as Yoda might say, there is no “try.” President Trump had the legal power to fire Mueller as special counsel. It makes no sense to claim that he “tried” but failed to do so. Trump could have fired Mueller, but he didn’t.​

more at the link:

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/04/did-trump-try-to-fire-mueller.php