So I guess he means that Jimmy Carter was a racist and bigot since the two parties switched 30 years ago.
Wow ... simply stunning! "Rosiane Santos has been charged with assault and battery for grabbing a "Make America Great Again" hat off a man's head in a Massachusetts restaurant on 15 February. Santos, who is Brazilian, now faces deportation after Immigration and Customs Enforcement said she was in the country illegally"
She felt empowered by the lefts TDS now it looks like it will cost her big time. She should have let it go then went and staged a hate crime, there’s no penalty for that.
The contrast in posts #244 and #245, and what people find to be important or even "stunning" events, tells any innocent bystander everything they need to know about our country at present.
Imagine being so self absorbed and self important that you equate fear of having someone take your hat off your head with people going to a place of worship with a firearm asking if you are there so you can potentially commit murder. I think the term snowflake is a little too dismissive of the serious dilussion of self importance. People have seriously lost their damn minds and now living in a LaLa land fantasy.
Meanwhile the MAGA crowd is threatening to kill Ilhan Omar by "putting a bullet in her head" Poor MAGA dude, who will defend his right to violence? Will the libs viciously harass him with their dangerous words? Our MAGA friends know the only good liberal is one full of lead: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...t-leads-to-arrest-of-new-york-man/3379387002/
YUP. Another lunatic triggered by someone who wears a MAGA hat. So much so that she assaults the woman for it. Then hides and says she has a right to not be recorded AT A PUBLIC PLACE. https://news.yahoo.com/woman-wearing-maga-hat-harassed-post-office-president-racist-014055730.html
Why do all these videos start recording after the alleged assault? I'm pretty sure the hat wearer was just as obnoxious if not more and she decided to start recording after releasing she can start a narrative behind it. I have little sympathy for anyone who walks around in political paraphernalia expecting confrontation and then seeking to play a victim. It's a victim hood mentality. Honestly, if I for some dumbass reason decided to wear Elizabeth Warren attire out on public and someone walked by me with some insult regarding Warren, I'm not going to whip out my smartphone and start shoving my camera in their face because that would just prove that my purpose for wearing the attire was to trigger people.
The assault happened two more times on camera. Watch it closer. 00:03 second mark and 1:07 mark. I marked each one for you since you didn't catch it, despite one of them being at the start of the video.
https://news.yahoo.com/college-grou...ghts-telling-not-wear-maga-hat-122911630.html College groundskeeper claims school violated his rights by telling him not to wear MAGA hat A groundskeeper at Suffolk County Community College on Long Island, N.Y. claims his First Amendment rights were violated when his boss told him not to wear his “Make America Great Again” hat to work.
Your first amendment rights aren't violated if your employer states not to wear political attire at the workplace. And it's a very rational reason why an employer wouldn't want that.
These people changed their story after first claiming it was a political statement and then claiming no hats were allowed... how the hell you gonna say a groundskeeper who works outside can't wear a hat? That is some clear shifting to avoid a lawsuit.
Ya after shoving a camera in her face. I added more to my previous post that you probably didn't read because of the timing of my edit. If for some dumbass reason I wore Elizabeth Warren attire out in public and someone walking by made a offhand insult about Warren, I'm not going to whip out my phone and shove a camera in their face. That just proves that my sole purpose of wearing the attire was to generate reactions.
If you owned a business where employees interacted with one another along with being seen in public you would seriously allow them to wear political attire? That's bad management and asking for trouble.
The issue is the lying to get him not to wear it and the fact that the guy is told no hats despite working outside. They could be more honest about it but they weren't. “Our dean kind of misspoke and he was right in saying it’s not proper work attire, but they’re under a collective bargaining agreement and they have an approved college uniform and a hat isn’t part of the approved college uniform,” Drew Biondo, Suffolk County Community College director of communications, told Newsweek. Yahoo Lifestyle has reached out to Biondo for further comment. " data-reactid="26">“Our dean kind of misspoke and he was right in saying it’s not proper work attire, but they’re under a collective bargaining agreement and they have an approved college uniform and a hat isn’t part of the approved college uniform,” Drew Biondo, Suffolk County Community College director of communications, told Newsweek. Yahoo Lifestyle has reached out to Biondo for further comment.
