[#NoCollusion] Should Trump go after the media and Democrats?

things are not always as they appear

 

Excellent post!!

 

Os, with all due respect, you are no rabbit hiding in plain sight of the duck.

 

you're right, more like a beautiful young centrist rather than a grouchy old leftist

 

Either way, you're dressed in woman's clothing.

 

wow, good one Lou!!!

 

Doesn't matter what disguise you wear you still own what you wear.

 

Regarding the part of your statement that I emboldened, the fact is that Hillary dirt from Russia is a foreign contribution to a US political campaign, and does, in fact, violate US law.

In re dossier info coming from Russian agents, unless agents working on behalf of the Putin administration provided the information to assist the HRC campaign, it is not the same form.

We are told Mueller is contributing to the coming Barr publication of a redacted SCO report, sure, however that in no way proves the Barr letter was not a misrepresentation of Mueller's work. Massive leap there, buddy.

 

LOL Yes, proving he was in Nigeria on August the 14th or any other specific date, does prove he wasn't in New Zealand on that same date.

Stuff about Page has actually been verified and proven true. I don't believe all of it about Page has been verified as of yet.

 

Apparently Kushner and Ivanka don’t need hammers when they just get daddy/step daddy to not purse anything related to their misuse of emails and cell phones.

 

With your post count.... carpel tunnels and hunched back at least.

 

Lol.... so Trump and his associates consistently lie because ” gullible people like [JuanValdez] would yell ‘smoke’”....

That’s the best excuse to why Trump consistently lied publicly about the Trump Tower meeting and what it was about you can come up with?

Did you believe it was over adoptions when they claimed it? Speaking of being gullible....

None of you Trump supporters can come up with a logical excuse to explain why Trump consistently lied and why his people lied. Let me guess.... this all 4D chess?

 

Lied about a meeting with the fusion GPS operative? I'm sure he thought it would lead to bad press.

In reality its proof he wasn't colluding with Russia. If he was colluding, why would he take a meeting with some strange Russian? Wouldn't he have contacts in Russia to talk to? Couldn't he just talk to Putin? You don't go meet some Russian with empty promises if you are working with Russia.

 

Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya worked with Fusion GPS?

Empty promises that the “dirt” wasn’t as good as thought?

I mean, we know a veteran and POW would alert the FBI towards that type of behavior but not a draft dodger and his spoiled son.

 

Yes. She even met with the fusion GPS CEO the day before and after the trump tower meeting. They have hired her many times.

No idea what you are saying here. If trump was colluding with Russia and Putin why take this meeting?

 

I didn’t know that. I do know that the Trump Tower meeting took place soon after Trump won the nomination and that the GOP stopped bankrolling Fusion GPS after Trump won the nomination. I know she was tied to getting the magnitsky act repealed as she was working/consulting for the Russian Govenrment.

The man who set up the meeting, Goldstone, spoke yesterday about why he offered up dirt to Trump Jr and set up the meeting up....

I don’t think Trump colluded, I think he didn’t care where or how he get help. I think the Trump campaign jumped at getting dirt on Clinton, tried to, didn’t get what they thought, and then lied about it repeatedly and more than likely directed others to lie about it.

 

The fake liberals, actual authoritarian moralists, are still outraged? Yup. Another day on Cfs.

 

I have listed some of the verified allegations in the past on this very bbs. Others have also listed them. Recently @JuanValdez listed one of the bigger verified pieces of information from the dossier within the past couple of pages.

Yet, you haven't bothered to look up any of the multiple posts listing the pieces of information that have been verified or proven. Interesting.

I have a firm understanding of what proving a negative means. I showed you why it doesn't apply in this case. I showed you specifically how parts of the dossier could be proven false. Your only response was off target. Interesting.