Wall Street Journal editorial this morning: The Smollett Hoaxers Again the media rushed to conclude the worst about their countrymen. 626 Comments By The Editorial Board Feb. 21, 2019 7:29 p.m. ET If you are wondering why the President of the United States took time Thursday to fire off a tweet about the Jussie Smollett case, the answer should be obvious: Mr. Smollett was soaking up the media’s attention this week. That said, the Smollett hoax is instructive—not for what it says about President Trump’s Twitter habits, not even for what it says about Jussie Smollett, but for what it reveals about the practices and social mind-set of the country’s primary media outlets. Since January, this country has experienced two media bonfires—over Covington Catholic’s high school students and now Jussie Smollett—whose common element is the reflexive judgment that much of American society is irredeemably bigoted. The first incident occurred on the National Mall between students from Covington, Ky., and a Native American drummer. Within minutes of a video emerging of Nicholas Sandmann smiling into the face of Nathan Phillips, the media—newspapers, TV and social media—erupted with condemnation of the teenager. Mr. Sandmann was also wearing a MAGA cap, which for much of the media now seems to be de facto proof of multiple anti-social phobias. That version of events, a subsequent video made clear, was false. Which is to say the media condemnation of the Covington Catholic students as racist was false. Now comes the Jussie Smollett incident—allegedly a racially motivated street attack in Chicago. The national media bought it hook, line and fake noose, again turning a presumed “hate crime” into an indictment of America. You would think these two fiascoes would cause embarrassment among this particular community of journalists and late-night talk show hosts. But we doubt it. At the national level, the compulsion to pronounce blanket moral condemnations about other Americans has displaced the instinct to find the facts. Reporters in Chicago, a city with a tradition of street-reporting basics, relied on their sources in the police department to cast doubt on what had happened. The city has now charged Mr. Smollett with filing a false police report, in this instance a felony. He denies it. Looking for some sanity? Listen to Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson’s remarks on Mr. Smollett Thursday: “This publicity stunt was a scar that Chicago didn’t earn and certainly didn’t deserve. To make things worse, the accusations within this phony attack received national attention for weeks. Celebrities, news commentators and even presidential candidates weighed in on something that was choreographed by an actor.” Maybe, as an actor, Mr. Smollett knew his audience—the elite media—would elevate him to political martyrdom, and it did. With Covington and now this, a rush to judgment rooted in a false view of this country’s values produced, as Chief Johnson noted, more gratuitous anxiety and polarization. Mr. Smollett deserves to be punished for his hoax to deter others. The media’s punishment will be its continuing loss of public credibility. Appeared in the February 22, 2019, print edition as 'The Smollett Hoaxers.' https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-smollett-hoaxers-11550795374?mod=hp_opin_pos1
"The Worms in CNN's Apples": https://arcdigital.media/the-worms-in-cnns-apples-2fb9d37b641b more at the link
"He added: "... Ivanka [has] a very nice figure. I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her." https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...t-unsettling-comments-a-roundup-a7353876.html Another beautiful triggering by the Majestic God Emperor.
I don't think triggering means what you think it means here. Should've used the free rent line instead. Pick up the pace! clap clap clap Quip Harder! clap clap clap
Uh, plenty of people (perhaps not here on CF, maybe) were appalled or triggered by the President's apparent lascivious interest in his own daughter. Oh, and I'm afraid to click that link.
Maybe I'm deeeranged, but it does sound appalling for a 70 yr old man with a history of objectifying women to objectify his daughter, let alone a presidential candidate who built his stock on his self named branding. huh huh huh, left wing bias lol?
Haha, people were triggered by an old creep that boasts about grabbing women by the p***y, for admitting that he wants to nail his daughter. Stupid lib cucks!
