1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Andrew Cuomo] "Tax the rich! tax the rich! tax the rich! WE DID!! now . . . the rich leave."

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Os Trigonum, Feb 4, 2019.

  1. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,664
    Likes Received:
    122,078
    again, it is unfortunate "effect" that the law "will hit blue states," i.e., rich/wealthy urban states, "harder than red states," i.e., poorer/less wealthy rural states. Here we see the neutrality of justification inherent in the tax law's purpose: "spread the wealth."

    "Blue states were already paying, as we agree, more than their per capita share." But isn't this the case for ALL taxation schemes? there is not a single tax for all social levels, i.e., "equality of treatment." It is difficult to see how this could be otherwise. Even if the impact is not neutral in its effect: "it sucks to be taxed."

    "The new bill seems to increase that imbalance, whether we think the original imbalance was justifiable or not." I take it that all calls to raise taxation levels will increase an imbalance between the have-nots who are taxed at a comparatively low level, and the haves who are taxed at increasingly high levels. There is nothing necessarily surprising or inherently unjust about this. "Soak the rich!!"

    "It's never been clear to me (other than the politics of spite) why we would need to further tilt the playing field." ahhh, but here it is you who is inferring a hidden cause "the politics of spite" that leads to an unwanted (from your perspective) outcome of "tilting the playing field." Perhaps you need to look at it from another angle.

    A less cynical view might simply infer the new tax law seeks to redress the past wrongs of rich states staying richer while poorer states stay poorer. All while using "the hidden hand of government" as its angel of deliverance. ;)
     
    jcf likes this.
  2. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,843
    A less cynical view would mean ignoring the people and forces that crafted the law, I guess, and it would mean ignoring the lack of charity from the uber-rich, who again have concentrated more wealth. :) But yes, that would be a less cynical view.
     
  3. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,664
    Likes Received:
    122,078
    again, the fact that a policy choice imposes a cost on one's opponents is a happy side effect, not necessarily the cause, goal, or purpose.
     
  4. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,664
    Likes Received:
    122,078
  5. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,206
    Likes Received:
    20,353
    Trump's SALT rules is having a big impact as well. Having my deduction for SALT capped hurt me this year - and I am looking to leave NYC - and that is one of the factors as it makes a big difference
     

Share This Page