Otto's on Memorial. They loved him, he loved their bbq. Their burgers were better, but he was always a down to earth guy there. I remember him shaking my dad's hand when I was a kid, and he introduced me, and I had no ****ing idea who he was but he sure looked important and I used all the yes sir's I had. Years later I ended up almost marrying James Baker's close relative. Danced with his wife at their other relative's wedding. Drank scotch with Baker, they wouldn't let me near Bush. Talk about a cockblock.
Hilary isn't well. Showed up to the funeral looking high as a kite. https://g.redditmedia.com/G7yJoMxPI...nted=false&s=7fc602cf809478cee1bdf29d6c483a10
Please inform us who pays the Clintons and what that has to do with working with foreign adversaries to undermine our election.
...I think the story going around is that they're bankrolled by the Bilderbergs as part of the Illuminati's continued master plan to rule the world. ...with George Soros...as the Beaver.
Well if that's the case, then we should all be thankful that evil cabal never had their chance to make our president look weak on the international stage, publicly denounce American law enforcement and intelligence agencies. We have been saved from having our leader get played by the N. Koreans, kss up to foreign dictators and lambast America's longtime allies. I wonder who the Larry Mondello character is in the scenario?
I doubt you even understand what a slush fund is. The information has been out there for some time. You do your own homework.
A Slush fund? No, wise and powerful @dachuda86. I have no idea what that crazy word is. It sounds kind of fun, though. Is it like mud wrestling? I did do some homework on it though and found that the Clinton Foundation was not a Slush Fund. That claim earned 4 Pinocchios from the Washington Post. In fact, the charge of the Clinton foundation being a Slush fund originated with Bill Allison who later clarified the remark saying that he was referring to media coverage. Allison also said the Clinton Foundation did good work. There was also a Parscale chart that came out with information that wasn't really even applicable. Again, what does that have to do with Hillary working with foreign adversaries to subvert and defraud our democracy? There are some questionable practices by the Clintons regarding the foundation and speaking fees. It would be better to focus on those rather than make the bogus charge that it is a Slush fund. If you'd care to do any homework yourself here is some reading. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...he-clinton-foundation/?utm_term=.75e81366ae23
