You support the people who were out there harassing a woman and her children. You're literally arguing that you have zero honor and integrity. Not the stance I'd take.
Two weeks ago Tucker Carlson was laughing that George Soros got sent a Pipe bomb - he is a despicable human being. Those people were arrested and will face a penalty - rightfully so, but when you are incendiary, you should expect to be burned. Maybe he will learn something......wouldn't that be great....you know like words matter....... Integrity means no compromising your morals - if you support Trump, you lack integrity. DD
Some context to the laughing DD references. I don't believe that your interpretation that he was laughing because Soros was sent a pipe bomb is accurate. https://amp-dailycaller-com.cdn.amp...soros?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCCAE=
By his own words, Tucket Carson is questioning the idea that people from different backgrounds and therefore different values can live side by side. This is the exact argument he has made. Guess who else made that argument in 1919? That Jews were never going to integrate with the German people because they maintained separate values incompatible with themselves. They were an alien group living amongst them and it didn't make sense and there is a need for a rational solution that addressed this reality for the benefit of both people. Do these two arguments sound similar? Do you know who was the second guy? Do you know your history?
You have repeatedly defended the actions of Antifa throughout this thread. That’s an absolute lie. He did not laugh because George Soros had a pipe bomb in his mailbox. He laughed at the notion that the pipe bomb was placed in his mail box due to being criticized by Donald Trump. That is a huge difference.
This really wasn’t that hard of an exercise. Perhaps you should go through the thread and delete some of you posts next time you issue that type of challenge. Here you are saying its Tuckers fault for the attack and he really doesn’t have the right to be upset about it. Here you are implying that its against Tucker Carlson so why should anyone care.
You should at least take a few minutes to watch the video before talking about things you know nothing about. Tucker never said people from different backgrounds couldn’t live side by side. What’s worse is you did exactly what he warned his viewers people on the left would do when he said, “don’t let the left lie to you, it doesn’t mean we have to look alike. It doesn’t mean we have to come from the same places.” Here is the quote from his so called rant. I’ll post the whole video as well. It seams like anyone with a 6th grade reading comprehension level would be able to understand that quote. He’s not saying diversity isn’t good or useful or that we can’t live together. What he is saying is that it’s not our strength and without common beliefs diversity can create tribalism within a society. Diversity is great but in order for a society to survive, there has to be unity and common beliefs. That is very clearly what he is saying.
Or even better there is this definition straight from the Code of Federal Regulations: The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations defines terrorism as "the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives" (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85). - Thanks to Astrodome for posting this in another thread. That definition perfectly describes what happened at Tuckers house. An unlawful use of force and violence was used to try and intimidate Tucker Carlson to in furtherance of a social agenda. Since that is actually the Law, we will use that definition.
Oh, I watched that disgusting video and I see you omitted the most bigoted part of that video which I am not surprised. First of all, to say that diversity is a hindrance in the military is bigoted when numerous military studies all have shown that teams made of diverse people from culturally different backgrounds out-perform groups with "homogenous values" But let's focus on what you left out - which clearly shows you are debating here disingenuously - that comes to no surprised as you are showing your unsavory character more and more. That is what he said. And let's be clear, it's the same thing a man once wrote in 1919 about the Jews. A man who would come to be fiercely respected by many of the same people who now listen to Tucker Carlson.
Hypocrite is what you are. Mad at Carlson for laughing at a threat of violence (it was a fake bomb because none went off and yes this is terrorism) and then you support Antifa's terrorism. You are a partisan who uses the team mentality. Get away from it friend. Step back and look at your views.
The fact that he's a journalist, opinion-based or otherwise; means anything anyone says or does to him is fair game for reporting. Separately one of the key aims of any protest is to draw awareness to an issue: as lacking the funds for litigation, lobbying and legislation precludes them from actually resolving the issue at this point so any press a this moves the needle and attracts potential donors, promoters and professional advocates. So the reporting both works to their benefit and was their ultimate objective. It is also of note that in the last two generations or so, subjects of protest have shifted from elected officials and public institutions to commentators and celebrities of an opposing political ideology. That this serves less to resolve an issue than to simply demonstrate one's loyalty to a particular faction is problematic.
