If the Democrats wanted more info from Ford they should have asked questions of her when they had a chance instead of buying that story of hers unchallenged.
Wrong. Using the definition you provided and Kavanaugh's own calendar it proves that he was with the people Ford named partaking in the activities Ford named. That doesn't prove Kavanaugh is guilty, but it corroborates that he was with who she said he was with. It shows that he was doing the things Ford said he was doing. That is more than zero.
I can teach you some basic vocabulary if you like. I do charge for tutoring but since you aren't a student at my school or even in my district, it is allowed. Discredited means it was proven false. Nothing shown proves she was lying.
I'm amazed and appalled that nearly 50% of the participants in this poll think that he is a sex offender......based on no evidence. I guess they "just believe."
Hey teacher..... confirm or give support to (a statement, theory, or finding). "the witness had corroborated the boy's account of the attack" synonyms: confirm, verify, endorse, ratify, authenticate, validate, certify
Thank you for posting that definition. Kavanaugh's own calendar gives support to Ford's claims. They show he was with the people she named, doing the activities she named. She made the statement before seeing his calendar, so it definitely supports her claim.
Wtf does the council of churches have to do with his immature tweets basically bragging about new evidence like he’s a celebrity. I don’t give two ****s about the council of churches has to say and im a Christian. Let me guess, someone knew they could make a handline that could possibly sway conservatives by asking them what they thought of Kavanaugh. Obviously the council is gonna say they don’t support it. That’s the ****ing textbook answer they have to give in order to save face from scrutiny. Asking the council of churches that question is like asking the Catholic Church their thoughts on ****ing little boys. Of course they’re gonna deny and condemn that ****. You think they’re gonna respond with “well after 100 years of these cases I thought the public would catch on by now, but somehow y’all keep supporting us” Lol I’m not trying to talk **** but bringing up the opinion of the council of churches to help determine this mans guilt/character might be the most naive **** I’ve ever heard. It’s 2018, respond with what the SJW want you to say or risk your livelihood Please inform me of how you gained such a strong assurance of this mans guilt, besides the council of churches opinion
He had an entry in the calendar showing that a woman who issued a sworn statement that she has never met him was there? Do point that one out or you can continue to offer up more nonsense.
She named him, and his friends that were there. His calendar had the same friends. She mentioned he was already drunk when she got there. His calendar said they were drinking. It's a match. According to Ford, she and her friend showed up later. You are the same poster who tried to claim his bufu derivative reference wasn't about anal sex because he probably hadn't had anal sex, right? I am only asking to see how far you are willing to go to rationalize Kavanaugh's lies and demean a woman who stepped forward knowing assholes would attack her for telling what happened. I'm sure Kavanaugh doesn't believe he didn't do anything wrong. I'm sure that Ford believes Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her. I have my own rationalization how that could all be true on both sides.
No Granville, there was no entry with the exact same list of attendees in Kavanaugh's calendar. Yes. I'm aware that combined with an attendee list sans Geyser and Geyser saying she never went to a party or even knew Kavannaugh that it in no way shape or form corroborates Ford's story. Since you can't admit it. I hooked you up. Feel free to copy and paste.
Do you understand that she and Geyser showed up later, right? It wasn't planned that they would be there, thus they wouldn't be on the calendar. You are obviously going to keep ignoring that, so we're not going to agree.
Her timeframe changed from mid eighties to early eighties and back. There is a good chance he hung with his friends again too. Anybody who attended my high school could've guessed who I was with on a Friday night.
According to Kavanaugh "The Honest", they didn't know each other or run in the same circles so she wouldn't have known.
You are wasting your time. He is willfully ignorant. Let him have his little bubble and save your sanity.
Knowing each other personally is not a prerequisite for her to know who he hung with. I have met multiple people later in life who said they knew all about me in high school.