You just keep repeating lies. Till was not killed cos the woman lied cos she didnt lie till after Till was killed. (or do you think his killers had a time machine in Mississipi back then?) In fact the woman did not tell her husband, the killer about the event with Till initially. The husband, who was out of town, was informed by a bystander at the store. She claimed she did not tell her husband cos she was afraid he would attack Till. She lied to cover up Till's killing. You cant change history and can only delude yourself thinking you can. Nothing you do will hide your racist mentality.
Again, your only problem with what happened was who it happened to, you are today in full support of a public lynching since it is happening to "the right kind of person". Also, you legitimately make me laugh at you every time you accuse me of being racist as if you have the credibility to do so....I mean, you aren't a woman, no one is going to believe you without evidence.
You are a racist and your post are clear evidence of it, including your recent attempt to repurpose the death of Till to push you selfish narrative in defense of Kavanaugh, while denying the truth that the poor boy was killed by racists like you for being black. I dont advocate for public lynching of anyone but I am entitled to my own opinion, as you are to yours, as to what I deem credible. Kavanaugh should not be on the SCOTUS - that's my opinion (and if you cant live with it, feel free to go bungee jumping into the grand canyon without a chord)
I don't doubt that a knuckle dragger such as yourself believes the nonsense you spew out of your mouth....so I don't blame you, I blame all of those who failed you growing up. If you had any decent role models, if your father was around more, if you had any good teachers, perhaps you'd be better than this. Unfortunately you are an example of those who fall between the cracks in society and I really do feel for you. As to you believing that Kavanaugh should not be on the SCOTUS....well obviously, that's what you've been told to think by your....well, call them whatever you wish to call them but the people who tell you what to think. My only problem was you pretending like the bogus accusations against him were legitimate cause to believe that or that you do any independent thinking of your own. We both know the truth when it comes to those issues, you have nothing to gain by lying about it because the lies won't be believable.
Right now, it has been abused because Feinstein held the information hoping to stall until midterms. Not sure why no one on the left are outraged about that. Her conduct needs to be investigated.
Her conduct can be investigated after the Kavanaugh investigation is complete. At this point, an investigation really shouldn't even be needed as Kavanaugh has lied under oath to congress multiple times and lied at his hearing. I don't know many people that hire someone that lied to them multiple times (especially for a lifetime position), but because of politics, here we are.
I think they can investigate Fienstein at the same time they are finishing up confirming Kavanaugh. I don't see why the 2 things would interfere with one another.
You not liking his answers isn't committing perjury. If he did, I'm sure it will be in the FBI investigation report. Ford certainly lied about her fear of flying preventing her from being interviewed. She either lied or had info withheld from her saying she didn't know the committee could come to her. Dr Ford says that she spent all day swimming yet wore her wet swimming suit underneath her clothes to the party. Ok.... Or did she keep a spare because she clearly said she was swimming. "One evening that summer, after a day of swimming at the club,"
No. There is nothing in the Constitution that establishes the criteria for which a Supreme Court Justice must be judged on. This isn't a criminal trial, and it isn't even a civil trial...... it is like Graham said, a job interview for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court. What seems to be lost is that credibility is important, as is circumstantial evidence. All of the accusers were around Kavanaugh in school and attended social events with him. The timelines match up. Does that mean that that he raped them, no only that the story is plausable under the circumstances. So credibility becomes very important....... and this is where Kavanaugh absolutely fails. He lied to congress under oath in 2003 and 2005, and lied to the Senate judiciary committee while under oath. He has no real credibility based on his track record. Now ask yourself, would you hire someone that lied to you during a job interview and had three credible women making sexual assault allegations against the man you are interviewing? Now imagine if it was a lifetime appointment. At this point, the only reason Kavanaugh hasn't had his nomination revoked is politics...... even Jeff Flake said that had he not been retiring, there would be no way he politically would have been able to vote against Kavanaugh. Sometimes the easiest answer is the most truthful..... and this isn't likely the end for Kavanaugh's problems, you better believe that there will be an investigation concerning his prior perjuries, and he may lose his federal judgeship. All because he couldn't stop lying..... yet this is the man you want to be on the Supreme Court?
Respectfully, I really don't want to engage with you on legal matters. The last 2 times we did, it didn't go well for you.
I have been an attorney for nearly 20 years and was a federal prosecutor for 10 years.... I am not debating with you, I am attempting to educate you, because honestly you are either ill informed or purposely ignorant. I made the mistake of believing that you were ill informed, but now I understand that you are purposely ignorant. Wallow in the pig **** of your ignorance, I won't bring the issue back up with you again...... just be aware that you sound like a fool to anyone that has actual experience on the topic.
They aren't outraged because they know they have nothing but a stall tactic. Now we are seeing, "well he lied" at the hearing as a way to remove him as candidate. There is already a shift as they realize this won't work. Political theatre at its finest. Dr. Ford is just a pawn in political battle.
A truly excellent post, Nook. You summed up how I view Kavanaugh, and spell out the consequences this process could have on the man very nicely. I think the chances are good that he'll be impeached and removed from the federal bench after the new Congress is sworn in.
Lets just stop there. Three credible? Ford, is putting people in places they say they weren't while mentioned she hates flying with an extensive flying background. She literally can't remember anything except Kavanaugh. She still hasn't gone to the police on the matter. Her lawyers apparently never told her about the private meeting with Kavanaugh because they were clearly colluding with the Dems to make this public. Saying that, if the facts come out and they find something then he doesn't deserve the job. In regards to the other "credible" allegations One of the other two is being investigated on criminal charges for making up the allegation and the other has a past of saying she was a grad at a grad school when she never went there. Credible? Is that all you got? In regards to Kavanaugh's character, he has a pretty remarkable reputation of being a great guy and fair in the judicial setting. These are just facts. I watch CNN spew all this non sense and two days later after repeating the same thing, the people on here spew the same liberal talking points. At the end of the day, lets look back at the situation with Merrick. Stall tactics. Its the same ole thing.
Why would I be outraged by that? Lol, even back in the '80s, swimsuits dried quickly. I have some daughters and it's SOP to bring a dress they can quickly throw on on top of the bathing suit to leave. There's really nothing hard at all to believe about this facet of the story.
Says the guy who is still waiting on Crane's bogus lawsuit against McLane to come to court. LOL. All that experience of yours made you look like a fool on that one.
Nook, doesn't even know what credible means. Sourcing fake assault allegations as such(Hey Ford's might be true). Good lord.
