1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Feigen: Rockets confident they will sign Melo

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by justtxyank, Jul 9, 2018.

  1. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,371
    Likes Received:
    121,700
    [​IMG]
     
  2. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    22,673
    Likes Received:
    12,336
    There is no rush on OKC's part to rush the buyout. They are going to pay him anyway. They might as well wait until all their options run out before doing the buyout.

    Edit:

    I just checked that the deadline for the stretch provision for this season is August 31. We have another 6 weeks on the 1 yard line.
     
    hakeem94 and bilaal14 like this.
  3. xtruroyaltyx

    xtruroyaltyx Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    12,457
    Likes Received:
    15,888

    I don’t know what you are debating.

    My point is presti doesn’t just want to release him so he’s going through his options. If you disagree with that then I disagree with you.
     
  4. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,051
    Likes Received:
    15,224
    They can trade him to the Rockets for Ryan Anderson. Then we can waive and stretch Melo and get only a $9 million salary hit instead of the $13 million hit it'd take to waive and stretch Ryno.
     
  5. Bobsputin

    Bobsputin Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,182
    Likes Received:
    1,455
    That's not saving OKC money. Ryan would be ~8+M for 5yrs if he is waived.
     
  6. aroundtheblock2

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2013
    Messages:
    1,672
    Likes Received:
    1,755
    Why would OKC do this? Ryno still has 2 years left on his deal. Adding Ryno would defeat the purpose of buying out Melo.
     
  7. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,051
    Likes Received:
    15,224
    But, it would serve my twin purposes of getting rid of Anderson and not having Melo on the roster. Besides, maybe Anderson would be a useful player with a change of scenery.
     
  8. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,078
    Likes Received:
    29,497
    Yeah, our offense was so predictably ranked higher than the almighty Golden State offense with unstoppable scorers Durant, Curry, and Klay.

    Man, we REALLY need a high volume shooter like Melo to beat the Warriors.
     
    Pizza_Da_Hut likes this.
  9. K-Low_4_Prez

    K-Low_4_Prez Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    7,455
    Likes Received:
    1,340
    It’s a fact... Trevor played more than anyone on our team last year.

    We should be fine for the regular season but we have to add a good wing before the playoffs and we just don’t have many assets to do so.
     
  10. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,078
    Likes Received:
    29,497
    Ariza shot .371 in 2017 playoffs and .281 in 2018 playoffs. Combine those two years you get .322.

    Melo shot .214 this year in the playoffs as the third option. BTW, he actually became pretty good at shooting 3 since his 4th year in Denver. But his playoffs shooting was much worse than his regular season.
     
  11. Vivi

    Vivi Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2016
    Messages:
    18,561
    Likes Received:
    20,774
    OKC would've to trade Ferguson and a 1st at this point, i think at least...that's basically all the assets they have left, and Presti desperately need to hold those cheap players going forward.
     
  12. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,078
    Likes Received:
    29,497
    I am not against signing Melo to the vet min. If he works out, great. If not, no harm done. But using the MLE is another story. Then you risk not using that money to get a quality wing.
     
  13. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,881
    Likes Received:
    39,829
    That ship has sailed.
     
    Deuce and ElPigto like this.
  14. Fyreball

    Fyreball Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    15,158
    Likes Received:
    12,791
    Who is the quality wing that's out there for the MLE though? Every option that we thought would be available for MLE money has signed one year deals at a higher salary. Also, signing Melo to the minimum puts you in a worse spot long-term if the pairing works out. You don't want Melo becoming an UFA next season. A multi-year deal with the MLE is the only way to counteract that.
     
  15. Smacktle

    Smacktle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    1,156
    Count me in as a MOFO (Melo only fan only)!
     
    snowconeman22 and H-Town Melo like this.
  16. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,734
    Likes Received:
    41,148
    Merry Melo-mas!

    Why?

    Because every day is Melo-mas here, sillies!
     
  17. rocketjunkie

    rocketjunkie Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    942
    Likes Received:
    251
    No you don’t. You fight fire with water. But if still take Melo for the min on MLE (preferably the former so we can save the MLE for February when someone gets bought out).
     
  18. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,078
    Likes Received:
    29,497
    Your reasoning is based on a high probability that Melo will work out well here. But are you sure?

    Melo is not young, neither is Chris Paul. Even if Melo works out for us this year (which I think is a big IF) there is no guarantee that he will continue to be good next season. What if he doesn't work out or worse becomes disgruntled and you are tied down with a long and subtantial contract with him? And if that MLE money pushes us to the lux tax territory, we may have to give up some useful player just to avoid the tax or save some tax money for Tilman.

    My prediction is, if Morey is indeed going to use the MLE on Melo, it will be a one year deal simply because there are no better options out there left this summer. I don't think he will want to take the risk on a long term contract with Melo -- unless of course if Chris Paul is pulling the string behind the scene.
     
  19. rserina

    rserina Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    18
    I tend to agree. You can't sign him with Bird rights after a single year, so if you want him back it would require the MLE next year anyway. And I'm not sure you want him any longer than three years anyway. Give him a portion of it, and use the rest to sign Melton to a three-year deal.

    If there were a better target out there for the MLE, you could take the other approach, but as you said it just hasn't worked out that way this year unfortunately. Best to save next year's MLE, when a lot of the second- and third-tier guys who signed off on one-year deals this season or can't get a longer contract (because teams are spooked by the hangover from 2016--read: Ryan Anderson--are wary of overpaying on longer deals). Between Harden, Gordon, Green, Ennis, Melton, Melo, and Tucker, we have plenty of guys we can throw in at the 2-4 spots, and odds are pretty good we sign another on a minimum. Odds even better, IMO, that we put together a package for another wing before the trade deadline.
     
  20. H-Town Melo

    H-Town Melo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2017
    Messages:
    1,353
    Likes Received:
    2,267
    This aint Pokemon B.
     

Share This Page