I feel bad for them, but I think they also have some responsibility with how it plays out if they were the ones complaining to the boss and asking that she be kicked out.
At the end of the day she is the boss. She made a call that has them out at least a weeks pay and probably more. Employees like that ask for dumb stuff all the time. I read a few articles and just saw her sort of using their political leanings as an excuse, no mention of any mutiny.
Is there a certain threshold that relies purely on individual merit if you were a small business owner where you would feel compelled to refuse service? Like in math, set the limits to the extremes. So let's say Adolf Hitler incarnate requested service at your small business, would you deny service? I just want to know if you feel as if there actually is a threshold where you would deny service, but just disagree that Sarah Sanders doesn't meet that threshold or rather you just disagree with the principle in general regardless of context?
You have to use a better example. If Hitler comes in your business you are in an occupied country and refusing to serve means you and your family are dead. I would make the responsible business decision in a sit down restaurant (not a client type business) and serve most people. take a real POS like louis farrakhan. I think you should probably serve him.
You are using unnecessary story dynamics into my question. You understand my premise quite well. Insert any human you think has massive policy influence who you think propogates in your eyes dranonian policies.
I think for a sit down restaurant you make the right business decision. If serving the person associates you with them and hurts your business, refuse service. For a small business where the professional relationship involves talking and working things out over a longer term, be picky about your clients.
after being insulted by Trump on Twitter, these 3 comedians teamed up for a parody on Trump. afterwhich, Fallon and Colbert then discussed lunch plans. "Where do you want to eat?" Colbert asked. "Red Hen?" Fallon responded, referring to the restaurant that last week asked White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders to leave. "Red Hen it is!" Colbert said, https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...rien-response-donald-trump-insults/737152002/
Never been to jail and I've never so much as had a parking ticket, I've had cousins in jail for selling weed for multiple years and they are married with kids now. You guys keep telling on yourselves. The idea that someone can't stick up for someone else without being the same type of person, lol. It shows what type of human being you are. Only evil people think empathy towards someone else hard or crazy so I must have been to jail. ts because you don't have the ability to do it.
Haha, you mentioned a guy being desperate for sex in prison having sex with a man doesnt make him gay. Well, it sure doesnt make him straight, buddy. The person raped, no. But the dude who is desperate for sex is another story.
It sounded like you were in denial about being gay. I'm glad you have a clean record and I have no issues with your cousins homosexuality.
No someone desperate for sex in prison is not gay. they wouldnt otherwise be having sex with a man. its not the same thing as being gay your whole life and trying to marry a dude. they are two different things. sex and love aint the same thing. maybe to you it is maybe at home you walk around your house raping your wife or your girlfriend. I never put anything past trump supporters since trump has raped women as well.
Now it sounds like you are saying homosexuality is a choice made by men who can't get girls. Don't say that around white liberals fyi.
Try out your gay sex prison theory on a few white leftists and let us know how it turns out. Start a poll here. I'm just trying to help YOU out. I first heard this theory from Karl Pilkington which is a REAL bad sign for it's validity.
"its perpetrators are unthinkingly labeled predatory homosexuals. This terminology is deceptive, however, in that it ignores the fact that the vast majority of prison rapists do not view themselves as gay. Rather, most such rapists view themselves as heterosexuals and see the victim as substituting for a woman. From this perspective the crucial point is not that they are having sex with a man; instead it is that they are the aggressor, as opposed to the victim--the person doing the penetration, as opposed to the one being penetrated. Indeed, if they see anyone as gay, it is the victim (even where the victim's sexual orientation is clearly heterosexual)." https://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/prison/report4.html
So why does the restaurant think announcing pushing back the opening date to July 5th accomplish? The protesters now can plan and be there. The owner will now be faced with mor headache than she could possibly imagine
