1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Robert Mueller, Former F.B.I. Director, Is Named Special Counsel for Russia Investigation

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by KingCheetah, May 17, 2017.

  1. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
    Curious... this Russian Oligarch wasn't one of the sanction list, was it?
     
  2. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
    Oops, I guess my answer is in here...

     
    mdrowe00 and B-Bob like this.
  3. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,744
    Likes Received:
    22,517


    More context regarding the Oligarch who paid Michael Cohen
     
    No Worries and NewRoxFan like this.
  4. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,794
    Likes Received:
    32,482
    Clinton, he's even admitted to the perjury since then so you don't have to go out of your way thinking up a defense for him. I have a feeling though if this president lies under oath to federal prosecutors, the same people who defended Clinton will be out for blood....all the more reason for Trump to not fall into a perjury trap.
     
  5. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,625
    Likes Received:
    7,164
    But that happened 2 years after re-election, and you said he was re-elected despite the perjury.
     
    No Worries likes this.
  6. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,794
    Likes Received:
    32,482
    Well yeah, only complete morons didn't know that he perjured himself, it would be like if OJ came out and admitted to killing Nicole Simpson next week and then people pretending like no one knew before that.

    Everyone knew Clinton was guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice, they just decided that it didn't matter that he was guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice....which is fine I guess, but it just makes those same people hypocrites when they are holding their breath hoping that one day they might have a legitimate case against Trump for perjury and obstruction of justice.
     
    cml750 likes this.
  7. Anticope

    Anticope Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,020
    Likes Received:
    1,217
    ^^^^^^^
    This idiot is just completely making things up now. How could people voting in 1996 know that Clinton committed perjury in 1998?
     
    Amiga, geeimsobored, Nook and 6 others like this.
  8. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,840
    Because whoever you're referencing must be a super-genius. Good reason for normal mortals to have her or him or it on ignore! We are not worthy. (And bonus: we can stay on topic.)
     
    JeffB, Amiga, Buck Turgidson and 2 others like this.
  9. Anticope

    Anticope Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,020
    Likes Received:
    1,217
    Well if it makes you feel any better I'm pretty sure I'm on his ignore list so you'll be spared the worthless 20 post exchange.
     
    B-Bob likes this.
  10. prohibido

    prohibido Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2015
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    235
    LOL @ Kid Trailer strapping on his GED to argue legal procedure with an actual attorney.
     
  11. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
  12. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
    Very well written and hard to capture all the points in a few excerpts... well worth a complete read.

    How Michael Cohen’s Apparent Russia Payment Might Help Prove Collusion
    We might have a quid. Here’s the possible pro quo.
    https://slate.com/news-and-politics...lp-prove-collusion.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_ru
     
    mdrowe00, JeffB and B-Bob like this.
  13. Colt45

    Colt45 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2000
    Messages:
    3,230
    Likes Received:
    3,011
     
  14. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
  15. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
  16. mdrowe00

    mdrowe00 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,668
    Likes Received:
    3,894

    ...yeah.

    The Gordian knot in all this, as the author acknowledges, is Citizens United. Proving anything like collusion will be extremely difficult, unless somebody says something they shouldn't, but the fact that so much of this investigation seems to center not so much on the actions themselves, but on how they seem to be facilitated through old-style and brazen organized crime tenets is absolutely fascinating...

    ...what a time to be alive, indeed...

    ...well...for a little while longer, anyway...
     
    #2636 mdrowe00, May 10, 2018
    Last edited: May 10, 2018
    B-Bob likes this.
  17. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,573
    Likes Received:
    17,548
    DoJ witheld from Congress that they had a human intelligence source tied to Trump investigation.

    WSJ speculates that it might be someone the FBI/DoJ employed to spy on the Trump campaign

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/about-that-fbi-source-1525992611?redirect=amp&ns=prod/accounts-wsj

     
    cml750, sugrlndkid and peleincubus like this.
  18. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,922
    Likes Received:
    39,926
    I can’t believe doj would want to keep the name of an intelligence source away from nunes
     
    Rashmon, Anticope, Nook and 5 others like this.
  19. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,765
    Likes Received:
    15,077
  20. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
    Can't read the op-ed piece (don't subscribe). And not criticizing the author of the editorial. But wouldn't be more correct to say "Kimberley Strassel speculates", not "the WSJ" speculates?

    Important to note that (1) WSJ is a conservative paper (at least the editorial staff) , (2) Strassel is responsible for the self-described conservative editorial "The Potomac Watch" and (3) Strassel's pro-trump work is believed to be the cause of friction between the WSJ editorial staff and the WSJ reporting staff. She is known to be a vigorous support of trump and defended Pruitt's travel and accommodations expenses, believes Comey tried to entrap trump and considers the Steele dossier one of the ditiest tricks in politics. So it would be safe to say she is likely to be pro-trump in any writing she does.

    Again, in fairness, I haven't read the editorial. If someone could cut-and-paste into apost it would be helpful.
     
    Rashmon and B-Bob like this.

Share This Page