1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Two Million People (and counting) Receiving Tax Reform Bonuses

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by crash5179, Jan 12, 2018.

  1. jsingles

    jsingles Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    5,226
    Likes Received:
    3,562
    Between year 5 and 10 when the plan would turn red for me, which it would, I don't think I'll be in the same situation I am now. My financials will hopefully be in a different spot so the change won't affect me as they would in my current situation.
     
  2. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,051
    It's nonsense to continue with your false equivalency. You can't claim business isn't charity and then claim business creates jobs and raises wages/benefits without demand because they have a lot of money which is basically charity.

    There is no correlation between profitability and wages. I've shown you the data, you continue to ignore it and you continue to provide your anecdotes as evidence that real data is wrong.

    BTW, this isn't the first time companies repatriated their overseas cash because of a tax break and the last time that money was spent on stock buybacks not on jobs and wages.
     
  3. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,182
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    You are assuming things like interest rate won't affect you in other ways. Also even though it may not affect you directly, if it negatively impacts others that can have an impact across the board. Most jobs are somehow connected to consumer spending
     
  4. jsingles

    jsingles Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    5,226
    Likes Received:
    3,562
    Luckily my job has zero to do with consumer spending, or consumer habits whatsoever. I will absolutely deal with interest rates in the coming years, mostly via real estate, but how things are today are not likely the way they will be in 2020 and beyond.
     
  5. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    Clinton was the 2nd best president of my lifetime and did a really good job with the economy.

    Both Bush presidents were largely ineffective IMO. I absolutely agree with you about the government needing to control spending.

    There are aspects of AHC that I like but it is not a net positive on debt as it pushed the national debt to record highs and a debt to GDP ratio of 106% which is light years higher than anything since WWII.

    If you want to make the argument that all dept is not bad depending on what you get for that debt then I’ll agree on that as well.

    The new tax plan is a great thing IMO but it’s the governments responsibility to get spending under control.
     
  6. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,182
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    ACH didn't push the debt to all-time high it was Bush tax cuts, a major recession, and the Iraq war. The deficit shrunk considerably by 2016.

    If it were me, I'd give companies that headquartered in the US and set at least 1/4 of their rev to domestic non-exec employment a 0% corporate tax rate. That would cover nearly every small business in the country. And I'd make the top individual bracket 50%, as well as make capital gains tiered.

    Entitlements are going to be a problem whether its ACH or universal health care. But to think that as a first world nation we're going to be a superpower into the next century when we have over 1/4 of the population without a good education and health care is ludicrous.
     
  7. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    1,888
    Marketing and social optics, like an MLK day sale. Remember when those didn't exist either?
     
  8. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    Thats just not accurate. Under 8 years of Bush and war in the Middle East the debt to GDP ratio never rose above 67%. In the past 8 years the debt to GDP ratio jumped from 67% to 106% as a direct result of AHC.

    Even if you look at just debt and not debt to GDP ratio the numbers are horrible for President Obama.

    - January 20, 2009 (the day President Obama’s took office) the debt was 10.63 trillion and rose to 19.4 trillion by the summer of 2016.
     
    #148 crash5179, Jan 28, 2018
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2018
  9. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,182
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    This has been debunked so many times. GDP shrunk incredibly during the great recession - yet you ignore that. You are simply repeating right wing spin here - not the facts. Bush was the source of 90% of that increase. But you have been told it's ACA which is a blatant lie.

    https://www.thebalance.com/cbo-report-obamacare-3305627

    The only contribution made to the deficit by Obama was the 1.3 trillion emergency stimulus which was necessary to jump start a sick economy and why were are in good shape today. Other than that every single part of that debt is Bushes
     
  10. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    I guess we can agree to disagree on why the federal debt doubled between 2009 and 2016.

    https://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/spending_chart_2002_2022USr_H0f

    - During the Bush years the GDP did not shrink, it rose from 10.9 trillion dollars to 14.7 trillion dollars. That’s +3.8 trillion dollars in GDP growth.

    - During the Obama years the GDP grew from 14.7 trillion dollars to 19.1 trillion dollars. That’s +4.4 trillion dollars in GDP growth.

    So the GDP did grow more under Obama than Bush, but it didn’t shrink under Bush.

    - The real problem is that under Bush our Government debt only rose about 4 trillion dollars but under Obama it ballooned by more than 9 trillion dollars.

    Those are the facts. Now you are free to spin it any way you want as to why those numbers are what they are but those are the facts. Just numbers.
     
  11. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,977
    Likes Received:
    36,811
    Those are facts depending on how one interprets your leading phrase "under Obama."
    [​IMG]

    That's a big data plot of quarterly GDP leading up to the recession and through Q3 of 2011. If you blame Obama for the nasty recession that started well before he was elected, it's fair to ding him for the missing extrapolation of this graph from 2009 through most of 2011 that would have greatly influenced the total debt numbers during his presidency. In pre-recession dollar values, the economy did not recover to former levels until the end of his third year. Government spending, under all presidents, sadly, is tied to the idea of a growing economy. Costs of everything keeps going up, of course.

    No, "no matter how you spin it," economists agree overall that a major recession will have an impact on federal debt. Also, LOL.
     
    Nook likes this.
  12. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,182
    Likes Received:
    20,334

    In 2008 GDP shrank and it did again in 2009 before rebounding in 2010. 2009 belongs to Bush as Obama hadn't had a chance to enact policy by that time - it was still Bush's policies and the stimulus Obama and Congress passed didn't hit until later that year and in 2010.

    Bush cut taxes early in his term which reduced income
    Year, Receipts, Outlays, Net
    1. 2000 2,025,191 1,788,950 236,241
    2. 2001 1,991,082 1,862,846 128,236
    3. 2002 1,853,136 2,010,894 -157,758
    4. 2003 1,782,314 2,159,899 -377,585
    5. 2004 1,880,114 2,292,841 -412,727
    6. 2005 2,153,611 2,471,957 -318,346
    7. 2006 2,406,869 2,655,050 -248,181
    8. 2007 2,567,985 2,728,686 -160,701
    9. 2008 2,523,991 2,982,544 -458,553
    10. 2009 2,104,989 3,517,677 -1,412,688
    11. 2010 2,162,706 3,457,079 -1,294,373
    12. 2011 2,303,466 3,603,056 -1,299,590
    13. 2012 2,449,988 3,536,951 -1,086,963
    14. 2013 2,775,103 3,454,647 -679,544
    15. 2014 3,021,487 3,506,114 -484,627
    16. 2015 3,249,886 3,688,292 -438,406

    You can see the Bush tax cuts dropping receipts a few hundred billion. Meanwhile Bush ballooned spending by 1.2 trillion dollars. It was over 3 trillion by the time Obama took over mainly because of the Iraq and Afghan war. Then the recession hit and killed receipts. So much of that 1.4 Trillion deficit is because of overspending by Bush, tax cuts, and the recession lowering receipts. Keep in mind that a lot of the programs belonged to Bush (TARP for instance) and even the stimulus was heavily influenced by Geitner. The stimulus was a necessary effort to save the economy, and it was passed with bi-partisan support.

    Regardless to blame Obama for that 1.4T deficit in 2009 given the lose in receipts, given the two expensive wars he inherited, given the programs Bush started to save the economy at the end of 2008 that were very expensive in 2009 - to blame Obama is just ludicrous and disingenuous.
     
    No Worries likes this.
  13. JoeyTexas254

    JoeyTexas254 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    91
    I have always received around $300 to $400 dollar bonus yearly and this year I got $4,500. So it is something new.
     
    cml750 and B-Bob like this.
  14. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,808
    Likes Received:
    132,400
    Let’s keep relying on anecdotal evidence.
     
  15. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    Or just ignore real world evidence. SMH. People’s personal experiences corroborate the larger numbers posted in this thread that so many have blown off as spin, conspiracies and just flat out lies. Personal experiences also remind us that we’re not just talking about numbers but real people.
     
    cml750 likes this.
  16. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,182
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    you just ignored the data and facts I put up...
     
    JoeyTexas254 likes this.
  17. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,808
    Likes Received:
    132,400
    Okay. I own and run a business that is in several states and in Ireland. None of my employees received any additional bonuses because of the Tax Bill. There are nearly 130,000,000 full time employees in the United States. How many of them received ADDITIONAL bonuses as a result of the Tax Bill? How many will get additional bonuses as a result of the Tax Bill next year? If you want to rely on a handful of people posting on a message board as being representative of a sample size of 130,000,000; then have at it.
     
  18. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
    All I know is I haven't received a raise, bonus, or even decrease in what I am being taxed yet. Perhaps trump is simply targeting those that favor his tax cut and skipping over us that opposed it?
     
    superfob and eric.81 like this.
  19. eric.81

    eric.81 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    Messages:
    2,821
    Likes Received:
    1,492
    I'm in the same boat. I received a raise and bonus last year (December of 2016). Despite my performance going up, I did not get a raise nor a bonus this year. I am not being taxed at a lower rate either.
     
  20. ipaman

    ipaman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    13,207
    Likes Received:
    8,046
    you call it anecdotal but i'm sure for @JoeyTexas254 and his family that extra money is more than anecdotal. not saying this is @JoeyTexas254 and clearly not for you but for many scraping by paycheck to paycheck this is life altering income. why do you discount or not care about those people who aren't thinking about years from now because they're not sure if they can make it next month? aren't liberals supposed to be more altruistic than conservatives, yet you seem to care more about abstract debt and deficits than the everyday well being of real human beings.
     
    JoeyTexas254 likes this.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now