There's no legitimate scientific pushback today on climate change and its relationship to mankind co2 output. There are only people who try to point to single events to argue against it. Science is clear on this. The models are accurately predicting the events we are seeing today as part of the effects of global warming.
My series of threads on climate change precedes Trump’s 2015 candidacy. If the reply seemed cryptic then so be it.
You haven't posted anything about climate change in 3 years. Just weather reports and updates on el Nino.
Well, well, well, look at what we've got here. Some record setting low temperatures, including College Station, Houston Hobby, and Galveston.
Besides the economy and defeating ISIS, Trump's most impressive achievement in year one of eight is his total annihilation of global warming.
It is still totally ****ing hilarious that you do not (or sadly choose not to, or even sadder are unable to) understand the difference between weather and climate. Assclown extraordinaire.
It is truly amazing. What's so fascinating is that he seems incapable of even acknowledging there might be a difference. To him, climate change means it will never get cold again.
Apparently the NWS is Koch Brothers propaganda central. They're saying that Galveston and Houston Hobby have had consecutive days of record-setting temperatures.
Again.... someone want to explain to the resident meteorologist about the importance of the yearly temperatures in the north and south poles vs the temperature in Houston Texas during a cold front? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ent-scientists-report/?utm_term=.3c7892f9c25b
Nobody is stopping you. I have explained the importance in equatorial temperatures before, but to no avail. Sigh.
