I love your 'team' politics attitude which is displayed here. Did you really list Lincoln? From a time when the political landscape was completely different? I want a leader who is good for the country. Johnson and Carter were terrible. Bill Clinton was a pretty good president. Gore was a terrible selection and Kerry wasn't that much better. Compared to what both parties have put out over the last couple decades, Obama looks great. Quite frankly, I have never been attracted to the Democrat side because their primary focus is on social issues. That isn't to say we shouldn't address them, but I want a candidate who is going to work for me and the country. If you think my selfish concerns is a display of bigotry, then that is your ignorant interpretation. Now thanks to Trump, the liberals have gone batshit crazy with rage and have lost all sight of rationality. Case in point; Your first instinct is to label me a Trump supporter for pointing our your irrational logic.
Clinton isn't "equally bad" clearly the American people thought she was worse which is why she lost the election despite Trump's many self inflicted wounds.
Don't care if she gives interviews. I've moved on, suspect most people have. While Fox News reports that Democrat officials wish she would fade away, I have a hunch most Democrats simply don't care. Seems it bothers republicans more. Perhaps they should move on too?
"he didn't say everything I quoted."- these are your words, Bandwagoner. So, you're admitting that you're wrong?
65,844,610 people thought Trump was worse. 62,979,636 people thought Clinton was worse. Arithmetic's a b****, eh?
I said you cut out words. You said your quote was perfect. You're a liar and you're too craven to admit it. What you said about my accurate quotation was also a lie. Then some clown cml750 liked your lie. Guess that's more important to you. You are a loser, Dude.
'LOL' Democrats dont care? They are the ones on a witch hunt desperately trying to pin a Russian election fraud on Trump. You lost your mind son.
The majority of 30 different states thought that Hillary was worse.....which is why she lost. Point is, ANYONE who would have lost to Trump in a one on one national election given the built in advantages they'd have is a national disgrace.
16 GOP candidates, many if them objectively more qualified lost to Trump also. You place to much value in the opinions of the average American from flyover states. Maybe they are just wrong and have been deceived? Is that such a far fetched reality to even consider being a possibility for you?
My quote is perfect sexpat. I'm sorry you couldn't find the video, and you will continue to use the guardian as news. I'm sorry you are still not using Clutchfans Dark. I'm sorry you had to go to the third world to get laid and think that makes you special.
However, 31 states thought Clinton was worse. 19 states thought Trump was worse. That's why we won. It's just that you said 'people." I was just using your words. If you said , "More states thought Clinton was worse," that would be correct, but then that would be an example of personification.
No one can find the quote because it does not exist. You know, other people in this thread can see your cowardly weakness. You lie. You are a liar. Do you not care at all?
Which phrase did he not say then? The quote exists. Here it is for you "I'm appalled and furious...terrorists will deliberately target innocent Londoners...6 people have been killed, more than 40 in hospital...some of them are critical...the threat level remains at severe...attacks across the country are highly likely...terrorists are constantly evolving finding new ways to disrupt us, harm us, attack us...no reason to be alarmed" -Mayor Sadiq Khan
I know that you are still impressed about how your girl ran up the numbers in California as if it is something that matters, but winning the vote of the majority of people in 30 states is MUCH more impressive and much more indicative as to how the country feels as a whole. Did he lose a one on one election to Trump? I'm pretty sure he didn't. In fact, I'm pretty sure no one else would have done that other than Hillary. When you split the vote 17 ways or whatever, sure, Trump might get a plurality, but that's not the same as winning a one on one race.
Witch hunt? You're not concerned with all the smoke? Or is the U.S. intelligence community part of this witch hunt?
Although, for the record, I wasn't a Cruz supporter either. While he's better than Trump or Christie, his social stances don't work with what I believe in.
I did- I quoted you: "he didn't say everything I quoted."- these are your words, Bandwagoner. So, you're admitting that you're wrong?
