Leftists really raise the level of discussion around here. I'm shocked you guys don't win elections more often with your incredible logic and arguments.
yeah that one poster really represents all the logic and arguments that you typically just avoid. LOL. Better just keep responding to him. And I'll just choose to reply occasionally to RussiaLegend or bigtexxx and then I can feel smugly superior to all conservatives and call it a day.
That poster is one of the better lefties. I could have quoted far worse like your anti-science, pro sterilization, Malthusian BS you like to spew.
How often does an low-info boob like yourself get to call a man with a degree in physics anti-science? You are truly a moron. But you probably spell that moran.
The irony of this is beautiful. Class A dumbass that rarely ever provides substance swoops in to call someone else out for the same stuff. Don't ever change friend.
The herd protecting their own kind. Original poster saved from thinking for himself. Tactics doubled down on. Notice it is a commonly used attack on conservatives around here that we white knight for each other. (THESE guys have said that lol) I'm SHOCKED you guys lose elections.
Okay, Bandwagoner. If I'm "pro sterilization" (false no matter how many times you say that)* then you, since you often attack Trump critics, are a pro-Trump zealot who worships his every poorly syntaxed word as gospel and marches weekly in his defense, holding misspelled signs when you aren't mistakenly waving Russian flags. ... Oh wow, that was fun rhetoric. Accomplished a lot there. As far as anti-science, I guess my anti-science scientist self needs to get back to work. My weekend work is reviewing grant proposals for the National Science Foundation. So you're not only much smarter and more scientific than me, according to you, you're apparently smarter and more scientific than most of the National Science Foundation itself, as they really trust and solicit my judgment. Pat yourself bigly on the back, and, if you really want to help out science, sign up to volunteer your expertise to NSF at fastlane.nsf.gov. Wishing peace to your strange, angry heart, but back to ignore. * = if anyone cares about his arcane context and strange accusation: once, many years ago, I posted in a thread that I think the Earth cannot handle infinite people and that we have to think about our total population and what the Earth can handle. The poster, (who seems to believe that science says we can have infinite humans on Earth), from this point on has said I am "pro-sterilization" since I wondered if China wasn't at least right to consider having an official population goal (having said nothing in support for any of their methods, or their horrible anti-girl results, etc.). What a forum, what a society, and what an age.
I don't need an expanded argument for someone who says Obama was a bad President,when that person voted for the guy who has already shown he may be the Worst President in History in less than 100 days. Historians already have Obama at 12. He will be firmly in the top 10 by the end of Trump's 2nd year...lol Dumbass is the proper response.
You have done a disservice to your argument here as your example of a similar accusation is so much more tame than the other posters just made about me. It only attacks my position and not me personally. I will accuse anyone of being anti-science when they say anti science garbage like you do. If you support top down population control, as you just did again but in a much weaker way than before (progress by me) understand the realities of those programs. All in the service on 100 year old flat earth BS. Take ownership. And now to calling me angry when clearly the emotional antagonizing posters are all in your corner. Surely coming back with some more incredibly thoughtful posts.
Interesting that something with absolutely ZERO evidence(Nunes has shown no evidence to back what he said behind it, Trump showed none, The Justice Department showed none,) has more to it than the Russians connections which has evidence all over the place including a declassified 14 page report from the intelligence community with their analysis of all the evidence they had showing the Russians tried to interfere in the election to the favor of Trump. It appears that your criteria for what is more credible isn't actually based on evidence but on which political team with which you align yourself.
FB, only time will tell where the truth lies. I see no point in going back and forth on this as we will all know the outcome soon enough but I do stand by what I said. I have no problem admitting when I am wrong but I do not think I will be admitting I am wrong when the truth comes out. As for your last statement, I don't really have a political team I align with. I am much more Conservative than the average Republican just as you are generally much more to the left than the average Democrat. I always vote for the most Conservative candidate just as you vote for the most Socialistic candidate. That usually leads me to vote Republican in general elections but I have voted Democrat in local elections based on my Conservative criteria.
This is very much tangential to the topic of this thread, but I'm curious. What's "anti-science" about population control?
haha cause historians are now the arbiters of who is and inst a good president. I have more respect for a high school diploma than a history degree. Top men have spoken Scarface. They say history degrees are worthless ****. I guess that settles that right Scarface? http://www.thedailybeast.com/galler...ess-majors-from-philosophy-to-journalism.html I mean i had an opinion of my own, but if historians say otherwise, who am i to argue.
Here are the results of that survey, for people who are curious: https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2017/ https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2017/?page=methodology
Dude says stupid things he can't back up at all then calls a scientist anti-science and cries when people think he lacks critical thinking skills. Next think you know he will start making up things about getting to Mars he got from the junk science rags he reads.
