London terror attack

You explicitly respond to me and say there's no community in Islam that forces hijabs on its women. How delusional and dishonest are you?

And look up the meaning of ad hominem, you clearly have no clue of its meaning.

 

Oh, lookie: Yung-T edited his post, in order to emphasize his lack of reading comprehension, which is his second obsession.

I never said what Yung-T attributes to me. "Reading comprehension" --a quote from Yung-T

Women in Islam do not have to wear hijabs.

(INB4 Yung-T makes an ad hominem attack and fails to argue hijabs again.)

 

LIAR. Show me where I said that, liar.

Your argument is trashed and your personal credibility is gone. You must feel like Donald Trump right now.

 

I didn't change the narrative at all, just added something in regards to your post.

But yea, you surely didn't say it.
This is just brutal at this point, I feel sorry for your apparent mental struggles.

 

HAHAHAHAHAHA Told you the failing Yung-T would come back with an ad hominem attack and nothing on his misguided hijab argument. (See below)

 

So quoting your actual words is an "ad hominem attack" and misguided now? You should really stop, it's sad (evidenced by the desperate laugh and throwing out words you don't know).

 

Actually, your own ignorance is being exposed: you wrote of me "your apparent mental struggles." That is not a quotation of me. That is an ad hominem attack. Either you don't know what an ad hominem attack is, or you're being dishonest again.

By the way, women in Islam don't have to wear hijabs and your argument is trashed.

 

How can you even for one second twist me quoting your statement "Then let me rephrase: women in Islam AND its community do not have to wear hijabs." to "you wrote of me "your apparent mental struggles." That is not a quotation of me."? I seriously don't understand how you can be so terrible at comprehension and still function in society.
"Then let me rephrase: women in Islam AND its community do not have to wear hijabs."
Please, to end this pathetic argument, look at your own words. You included the words "AND its community", meaning you're denying the involvement of the community or parts of it in forcing women to wear hijabs.

 

And no, it's not an ad hominem attack when every single post proves my point of you being completely incapable of processing any words. It's the sad truth at this point.

 

I see why you are begging to end the argument, because it's painful to be proven wrong after so much faux outrage.

So, now you want to rail against "its community" after earlier writing "the pile of **** that is Islam." You are getting more precise in your prejudice. Good job! Narrowing the focus of your hatred is a good first step to quitting.

As I implied in my religion v. nation post, I do believe there are societies that oppress Muslim women. That is not an indictment of Islam though. At the same time, I am acutely aware of Americans like you who oppress Muslim women by considering their religion ("AND their community"?) a "pile of ****."

You oppress Muslim women by considering their religion and community a "pile of ****."

 

So you go calling me out as a "LIAR" multiple times. I prove you wrong with your own statement, which leads to you suddenly talking about something I've said weeks ago and that has nothing to do with me showing that you indeed said the community isn't involved in forcing hijabs on women.

Great stuff, first blatantly calling me a liar and then suddenly talking about something entirely different instead of acknowledging your statement.

Ah yes, twisting my statement by adding the "AND their community" and adding it into something else I've said. So you apparently have to resort to intentionally making up lies (not for the first time) and not owning up to your own accusations, it's gross.

It's completely disgusting to what methods you resort to in order to defend Islam and shine a wrong light on me in any way possible.

 

LIAR. Show where I said so.

 

Already did. Welcome to my ignore list, can't believe I've wasted time on such an dishonest and lying idiot.

 

If it's always up to follower interpretation, then some will interpret it in ways that leads to violence and oppression and some will not. That is just a simple fact, not a defense. Unless you are saying, pretty much every interpretation for Islam leads to violence and oppression?

 

The smackdown is complete.

 

Was indeed sirbaihu, biggest waste of time and intentional lying I've ever encountered on this board (tinman is at least funny). He's on my ignore list now.

 

Surely not, my point was about about positive interpretations in both religions. I don't like them either way, but in the case of Islam they often lead to people painting a too pretty picture of Islam instead of addressing issues.

Yes, it also happens with the Bible, but fortunately the vast majority of Christians don't commit terrorist and violent acts anymore (at least not on such a huge level as Muslim terrorists), hence I tend to ignore it.