Disgraced former DNC Chair admits to sharing debate questions with Hillary

FB, if I remember correctly, you are an unabashed socialist who usually votes for the socialist candidate. Correct me if I am wrong please. If I also recall correctly, you did actually vote for Clinton in this election. Had the Democrats actually had a level playing field (no feeding Hillary questions and no super delegates), do you think Bernie would have won the primary?

 

Your opinion on Benghazi appears to be Republican talking points. There is no there there. And conflating Hillary with Benghazi there is even less there there.

 

cml750, if I remember correctly, you are an unabashed socialist who usually votes for the socialist candidate. You know, Republicans.

 

Whenever you're done SexxyTexxy, the rest of us have a more relevant controversy for you to address

 

You're compounding on my point. Trump is trolling. He is controlling the media. He makes stupid comments and the Left and the media eat it up. Whether he means it or not is largely irrelevant. Its one thing to report it and talk about it. Its another thing to saturate the news feeds and drown out real news. Calling Trumps immigration stop as a muslim ban is counter productive.

Obama was a subtle divider. Trump is a blatant divider. As the old proverb says, 'Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.". This is exactly what Trump is doing to everyone right now.

 

Yawn....

 

It's not an opinion, and it's not talking points. Hillary Clinton did lie about the cause of Benghazi by blaming it on a YouTube video when she knew that "talking point" was a lie all along. If you don't know that then that's on you.

Now don't mistake me pointing out her lies on the issue for me blaming her for what happened. Could she have done things differently that would have potentially helped? Sure, but I don't see that as an issue. What is an issue is her spreading propaganda about a YouTube video when she knew that was a lie.

That said, perhaps it was Obama who set that narrative for those in his administration to parrot and she was just doing her job. Hard to say really. Either way, talking about her "integrity" is absolutely hilarious.

 

I am a socialist who usually votes for the socialist candidate. That is correct. I definitely did not vote for Hillary Clinton. I would have if I'd been in a battleground state.

I was a Bernie supporter, but the corruption at the DNC did not play a role in who the Democratic nominee was. Hillary would have won with or without the biases of the DNC.

 

Making America Great Again?

 

So a CNN commentator leaked topics to a campaign in a primary debate is somehow the biggest scandal on earth.

Nevermind that a sitting president just fired the top attorney in the country who happened to be investigating one of his secretaries - and that's ok.

Conservatives like Bigotexxx have no clothes. They live in alt-reality

 

Space Ghost actually drinks up the koolaid he makes.

 

A lone Trump tweet and the garbage British Sun seemed credible enough for the Wiretap thread, love how you always call for legit sources but cling to the worst crap yourself as soon as it fits your narrative.

 

That is a superficial understanding of the events. I expect better from you.

I will type slow, and will use small words in small sentences.

The CIA provided "talking points" for Benghazi.

The Obama administration showed discipline. They stuck to the CIA talking points. They were professional.

End of story.

The Republicans had all sorts of problems with this. The right wing echo chamber made up crap, which later got Romney into trouble in the Presidential debates. After the 2012 election, the Republicans wasted millions of dollars looking into Benghazi and found nothing.

Just another example of party over country for the Republicans.

 

And it's still uncertain the role the video did play as the terrorist attack might have been inspired to take place because of the video. People act like it's either the video or a terrorist attack - not that both were related.

 

It's the same response from the Trump administration. They shout Fake News and don't trust unnamed sources. Only to turn around and quote Sean Hannity (who claims he's not a journalist) and a legal expert who got the wiretap stories from unnamed sources. Incredible.

 

No....it's an accurate description of the events. Hillary knew the truth from the beginning, we know this due to emails she wrote at the time.....she then went on to push the false narrative. Trying to blame this on the CIA is.....well, special. I know as a loyal Democrat, you are incapable of admitting that Obama did something wrong, but.....I guess I can't help you.

The White House invented the false narrative and then made everyone else go along with it. You don't have to accept the truth, but you really can't change it with revisionism.

 

Do you actually know any intelligent people?

 

I see the small words and short sentences got past you.

How about this? If Hillary told the truth, ignoring the CIA talking points, she would have been totally crucified for endangering CIA assets or some such. Besides, it was not her call to tell the truth. It was her job to follow protocol and stick to the CIA talking points.

This is not that hard to grasp. I am sure if you try hard enough you can do it.

 

When short sentences with small words are comprised of outright lies, you aren't going to get many to agree with you guy.

If Hillary told the truth, ignoring the story the White House invented (likely with her help), she might have been forced to step down by the president. I think we can both agree on that.

Anyway, I don't expect you to be able to admit Obama administration wrongdoing....it's part of being a partisan hack.