1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Astros interested in Quintana

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by Shark44, Dec 8, 2016.

  1. SWTsig

    SWTsig Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,053
    Likes Received:
    3,744
    you trade whomever at this point for an arm like Quintana. You pray that just one of your arms in the farm system turn into a quintana-level starter. why sit on a hope and a prayer when you can get the real thing at a very friendly contract? as others have said i have no doubt that lunhow & co. can restock the farm system. but you stock the farm system in part to help pry away players like quintana to help the big league club compete for pennants. obviously i'm not including bregman in all this.

    git r dun maury!
     
  2. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    That is different than your earlier claim that I was responding to - that you'd be sickened if the front office even *considered* the value of Martes or Tucker or anyone else in their decision making. That's not picking spots - that's just being stupid. Based on that, they should trade all their prospects for anyone who could help the team this year, whether a little or a lot.
     
  3. The Beard

    The Beard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Messages:
    11,370
    Likes Received:
    7,117
    That's what makes this an easy "do it now" trade for me

    It isn't three top prospects for a rental, it's for a guy who can be a force in your rotation for the next 4 years...it's a no brainer in my opinion
     
  4. tmacfor35

    tmacfor35 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    23,968
    Likes Received:
    14,582
    9 pages about a guy we most likely won't sell the farm for.
     
    Buck Turgidson likes this.
  5. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,961
    Likes Received:
    11,101
    They way I see it is the White Sox want Musgrove and the Astros aren't moving him. There isn't much else to talk about after that.

    I think the Astros are correct not to move Musgrove + top prospects for Quintana.
     
  6. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,768
    Likes Received:
    20,527
    And here I thought it was ...

    The White Sox want Tucker the Younger and the Astros aren't moving him.
     
  7. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,572
    Likes Received:
    7,098
    Pretty tame compared to the thread about Encarnacion who we aren't signing (well, probably).
     
  8. htownbball

    htownbball Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,608
    Likes Received:
    629
    I'm fine with using Martes as the centerpiece. You're getting back a #2 pitcher for 4 years at a really good price. I would not part with Musgrove. We need to hold on to as much MLB ready pitching as possible. I'd be hesitant to part with Tucker, but if he was the piece they're not willing to move off of, I would go ahead. I'd try to sub in Paulino for Musgrove and call it a day.

    I'd love to trade a package of Martes, Paulino, Reed, and Fisher for Quintana to hold onto Tucker.
     
  9. Jay713

    Jay713 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,044
    Likes Received:
    913
    It'll get done. Astros didn't make all these moves for entertainment purposes.
     
  10. Snake Diggit

    Snake Diggit Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Messages:
    14,817
    Likes Received:
    24,071
    I can understand not wanting to move Bregman or Tucker; those are top 5 draft picks that they probably won't be able to replicate any time soon. But look at what Luhnow and his team has been able to do:

    Success with late 1st rd picks: Fisher, Reed, Whitley
    Success with low level lottos: Martes (for 1/5 of Jarred Cosart), Paulino (for 1/2 of 1/2 a season of Jose Veras), Musgrove (for a pupu platter), Hader (for 1/3 of Norris)
    Success with international signings: F Perez, Abreu, Guzman, etc.
    Mid round picks that Provide value: Rodgers, Tucker, Kemp, Ruiz, Nottingham, Phillips, Mengden, Eschelman, Thurman
    Late round picks: White, Hauschild

    And this is before a single one of his drafts has fully matured. So yes, there probably won't be any Correa/Bregman/Tucker's coming thru the system, but there will be plenty of Martes/Musgrove/Perez/Paulino/Fisher/Reed's; probably 3 or more added every year.
     
    Nook and awc713 like this.
  11. MrBear1

    MrBear1 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2012
    Messages:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    481

    A lot of the "successes" you listed are guys who either have yet to play at he big league level or have failed thus far. Not sure I would be labeling those guys a success just yet.
     
    Astrofan59 likes this.
  12. SWTsig

    SWTsig Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,053
    Likes Received:
    3,744
    success in that they have value. tucker and martes don't have MLB success either but they're apparently the centerpieces in a potential deal to land us an all-star quality arm.
     
    Snake Diggit likes this.
  13. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,572
    Likes Received:
    7,098
    They are a success in terms of trade value. They are only failures if we keep them and they fail.
     
    Snake Diggit likes this.
  14. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,961
    Likes Received:
    11,101
    I thought Hinch came out and said the White Sox wanted someone who was going to be a significant contributor this year.
     
  15. xcrunner51

    xcrunner51 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    5,527
    Likes Received:
    2,482
    Count me in the MrBear1 camp. I don't consider all those successes, particularly the late 1st round pick group, because most haven't done anything yet.

    Frankly, he needed to be an above average farm guy to get/keep the job he has. He's been as promised on that end. The bigger question now is can he transition to "GM of a perennial playoff contender" from "GM overseeing a total rebuild" I think most people would say his ML trades and FA signings have worked out mediocre at best, downright terrible in some cases (e.g. Gomez).
     
    Astrofan59 likes this.
  16. Fyreball

    Fyreball Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    15,164
    Likes Received:
    12,813
    Obviously, if a team had come up to the White Sox and wow'd them with an offer for Quintana (much like what the Red Sox did with Sale, and the Nats did with Eaton), then they would have pulled the trigger already. The fact that there hasn't been a deal yet tells me the Astros are playing hard ball, but no other team is really willing to come in and give up the farm either. Hold to your guns, Luhnow, but don't let him slip away, either!
     
    mikol13 likes this.
  17. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    100,257
    Likes Received:
    102,332
    They haven't done that yet?
     
  18. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,518
    Likes Received:
    32,000
    There's a beach with this guy's name all over it.

    That's all I have to add.
     
  19. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    100,257
    Likes Received:
    102,332
    Thank god.

     
  20. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,747
    Likes Received:
    132,131
    I think he has thus far proven to be better than "above average" in handling the farm system and player development. He completely gutted and reorganized the Astros farm system and managerial style which is being emulated around baseball. His only real whiff has been Mark Appel and it should be pointed out that the Cubs and most teams had Appel as #1 on their board. (FWIW I wanted Benintendi over Tucker)

    He also poured resources into scouting the lower minors to maximize trade value and accumulate even more assets. He has done well in the middle of the draft as well.

    I am not a huge fan of Fisher or a few other picks. However Fisher has good trade and that has utility as well.

    The Gomez trade blew up in his face. He traded for a player in the midst of a poor season, known concentration issues and paid a premium believing that he would get a #1 pick by offering the QO. Obviously it didn't turn out well for the Astros.
     

Share This Page