1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

CIA: Russia manipulated the election to install Trump

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by SamFisher, Dec 10, 2016.

  1. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,747
    Likes Received:
    41,176
    Confirmed.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...able-main_russiahack-745p:homepage/story&utm_

    electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.

    Intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, according to U.S. officials. Those officials described the individuals as actors known to the intelligence community and part of a wider Russian operation to boost Trump and hurt Clinton’s chances.





    “It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,” said a senior U.S. official briefed on an intelligence presentation made to U.S. senators. “That’s the consensus view.”
     
  2. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,546
    Likes Received:
    17,509
  3. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,040
    Likes Received:
    23,297
    CIA and US intelligence agencies assessment <> conspiracy theories.

    Didn't said Russia was effective and "rigged" the election. What they have said so far is they were directly involved and tried to influence the US election. That shouldn't be tolerated.
     
  4. wouldabeen23

    wouldabeen23 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    2,026
    Likes Received:
    270
    We have arrived, this is the beginning of the post fact era. The Comb-over-in-chief-elect can tweet made up gibberish that his more cymical acolytes know is a lie and his administration says they think the CIA is wrong and unluxurious based on nothing while team murrica laps it up. Conservatives, you think this is liberal salt, that it's funny a foreign government directly hacked an election to help produce the results they wanted? Hillary probably looses regardless, but just because it broke your way it's no big deal? I wasn't on the Sam meltdown train over this originally but how do I respect an office, the highest in the world, after this? Maybe I'm overreacting, im sure I'll carry the label of triggered but this should make everyone take notice. I cant believe I'm saying this, but thank God Lindsay Graham is in the Senate and will investigate further.
     
    Zergling and B-Bob like this.
  5. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    100,250
    Likes Received:
    102,310
    It was inevitable, Sam, we should just sit back and enjoy it.
     
  6. Granville

    Granville Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    926
    This isn't great news for Hillary!
     
  7. wouldabeen23

    wouldabeen23 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    2,026
    Likes Received:
    270
    Brings to mind a Clayton Williams quote...to bad we can't enjoy the weather or the dry hump that Putin just gave us
     
  8. Amiga

    Amiga Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    25,040
    Likes Received:
    23,297
    Russian directly try to influence US election. Talk about Hillary. Give it up on Hillary already.
     
    JayGoogle likes this.
  9. RocketWalta

    RocketWalta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2001
    Messages:
    1,867
    Likes Received:
    1,967
    All you're going to hear is snarky responses from the right or justifications about how it doesn't matter who released those emails - that it's in the the national interest they were released. It's also in the national interest that our president-elect release his tax returns, but whatever.

    I actually heard somebody tell me, "Even if it is true, once Trump gets his people in there Russia won't have a need to hack anything, anyway."

    Indeed.
     
    JeffB likes this.
  10. DreamShook

    DreamShook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    75,256
    Likes Received:
    124,506
  11. Space Ghost

    Space Ghost Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    18,095
    Likes Received:
    8,538
    I suppose this officially settles it. Hillary should be president. Now we can officially go to war with Russia for doing what we do to every other country.
     
    RocketsLegend likes this.
  12. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,546
    Likes Received:
    17,509
    how did the Russian meddling manifest itself?
     
  13. RocketWalta

    RocketWalta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2001
    Messages:
    1,867
    Likes Received:
    1,967
    I don't know. Uncharted territory. Hopefully Lindsay Graham does that investigation and holds the administration accountable from the inauguration.
    Luckily, SNL is tonight so everybody will have forgotten about this when Trump tweets that he thinks he can turn Kate Mckinnon straight when he gr..well you know the rest.

    We're having fun!
     
  14. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,892
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Anyone using this as a reason to argue that Clinton is the rightful president is off base, unless they can show that Trump willingly participated in the cyber attack.

    That said, the Republican response to this is quite predictable -- focus on Hillary Clinton and her flawed candidacy rather than the actual security breach itself, which should be a concern to all Americans who care about the election process.
     
  15. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,546
    Likes Received:
    17,509
    agreed
     
    KDavis and wouldabeen23 like this.
  16. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,546
    Likes Received:
    17,509
  17. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,490
    Likes Received:
    31,955
    This is basically a "Bengazi was just a protest of a Youtube video" type story. Should the US work to prevent hacker attacks like this in the future? Sure, did it have anything to do with why Hillary lost? No.
     
    KDavis and RockFanFirst like this.
  18. Space Ghost

    Space Ghost Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    18,095
    Likes Received:
    8,538
    Except that has been the primary cry during the election against Hillary from day 1? Do you remember the whole "don't run email servers from your bathroom" all election long? Do you remember it was the left who said this was just another irrelevant attempt to smear Clinton?

    Cyber warfare has been a very big concern for over a decade. "Blame Russia" is not a valid form of defense for cyber warfare, especially considering the US is the biggest perpetrator by far. You're not going to stop Russia, China and all the hundreds of groups trying to compromise every electronic form in this country.

    With cyber warfare becoming one of the most important and influential concerns for the coming decades, why would we elect a commander in chief who does not understand why she should not run an email server in her bathroom? Or the party who actually got their dirt compromised and exposed?

    We can focus on the security breach; DNC, quit running a lose ship and tighen up your security. Don't put damning evidence out there to be exposed. Learn about morals and ethics.

    Do you think the RNC didnt get compromised?
     
  19. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,490
    Likes Received:
    31,955
    Also, it is funny that the same people who have praised Wikileaks for the "transparency" it provided in the past are the same people whining about it now that the light shined in the direction of their favorite presidential candidate. I guess everyone loves a whistle blower until that whistle is being blown on them.
     
    giddyup and KDavis like this.
  20. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,975
    Likes Received:
    36,809
    Good and yes. We should focus on that but most of all on the involvement of Russia and their preference for one candidate over another. The connections between Trump and Russia must now be exhaustively probed. This is very unsettling. I am not a person saying "okay Clinton should be president" -- not at all. She ran a bad campaign and lost the E.C. But Russia screwing around with our election and an authoritarian foreign leader having a preference for our leadership should bother us all.

    I don't know and you don't know. What seems obvious is that neither Russia nor wikileaks gave two ***** about RNC dirty laundry.

    Former CIA boss Hayden when told Trump was denying the CIA report:
    "To have the president-elect of the United States simply reject the fact-based narrative that the intelligence community puts together because it conflicts with his a priori assumptions. Wow..."
    http://money.cnn.com/2016/12/09/technology/trump-russia-hackers-cia

    Wow, indeed. The president elect should demand answers like everyone else, no matter that the Russians favored him. Unless there is something more to hide.

    EDIT: And I've never been a big wikileaks proponent, but I thought they could do some good if they really did just serve as a clearing house of info. I was open-minded. Once they established a clear agenda and only released some of what they surely received, and now clearly collaborate with Putin's government, yeah, now I pretty much don't think very highly of them. I was always a bit skeptical and now I don't consider them a legit force for transparency. I took in data, did some reading, watched their behavior, and my thinking evolved. (This has been known to happen with smart people from time to time.) It wasn't about "oh poor DNC, I must rally to their bloated, stinking corpse!" Um, no. Screw them. They suck, obviously.
     
    #20 B-Bob, Dec 10, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2016
    s.b713, JeffB, JayGoogle and 2 others like this.

Share This Page