1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Official] Astros Off-Season Thread

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by Castor27, Oct 2, 2016.

  1. Mr.Pringles

    Mr.Pringles Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2016
    Messages:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    1,891
    Would rather take a .280 20 hr Yuli Gurriel + the prospects than a .280 30hr Goldschmidt and being effed if someone gets hurt
     
  2. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,378
    Likes Received:
    16,721
    Goldy while an upgrade for most teams....there are fewer teams that he's a bigger upgrade than Sale is over the fifth starter.
     
  3. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    Yuri batted 0.262 last year. Goldschmidt has a 0.300+ BA over his career and hasn't been below 0.280 since his rookie year. And there's the 0.677 OPS vs 0.900+ OPS. Being effed if someone gets hurt is true for any star player, so unless you're just saying you don't want to trade for any big name, I'm not sure the issue with Goldschmidt there. Pitchers in general are more likely to get hurt (and be out for a longer time), and Goldschmidt doesn't have any kind of significant injury history. Risk-wise, Goldschmidt would come with far less than Sale.
     
    Pen15clubber and awc713 like this.
  4. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    Problem here is that leaves us even thinner on the pitching side. Unless they are getting legit SPs, there's no way the Astros can afford to give up Musgrove or McCullers - they need those guys to step up this year.
     
  5. leroy

    leroy Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    27,346
    Likes Received:
    11,207
    I think Luhnow is, in a way, trying to emulate what Toronto has done over the past few years. Build the offense first and add to the pitching as you go. I don't think Luhnow is done but I don't think we'll get a Sale or Archer before the season starts. I could see adding to the rotation in June or July. I believe they thing 2016 was more of a fluke for Keuchel than the norm.
     
  6. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,404
    Likes Received:
    34,574
    If a possible Goldschmidt deal was on the table, I would be more willing to include Springer. While their WAR rate looks fairly similar over the last 2 years, Goldy is a much, much better hitter. Trading Springer for a pitcher would make me hesitate because the offense still has quite a few unknowns. Plus while I love George, he's a bit of a square peg in a lineup. Power wasted at the top of the order, but not really good enough to be a good 3/4 hitter.

    There is absolutely no trade, and I mean that literally, in which I would trade McCullers, Musgrove and Martes and not get an ace back. Even trading Musgrove and Martes without LMJ would make me pause. We need top end pitchers, and pulling the trigger on them would leave an avenue to getting one very difficult for the next year or 2. It would leave seemingly only Keuchel and McCullers with front end potential and a sub par farm to trade from.

    And I should add, whenever the topic of trading Springer comes up, I feel the human element kicking in. He seems like such a fun character, and genuinely great guy on and off the field, on top of being a great ballplayer. Trading him would hurt more than others.
     
    #786 sealclubber1016, Nov 26, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2016
  7. SWTsig

    SWTsig Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,054
    Likes Received:
    3,749
    it would be sheer lunacy to trade McCullers or Martes without getting an ace back. We simply don't have the rotation depth to make a trade like that.
     
  8. AkeemOlaDROwon

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    312
    Likes Received:
    455
    Oh yes I do agree. I would NOT do that trade. Just saying that if we did not want to give up Bregman or Tucker for Goldschmidt then it would take a pitching package similar to the one I mentioned.
     
  9. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,378
    Likes Received:
    16,721
    While I can see being against trading multiple MLB/near MLB pitching prospects, I don't see a problem with sending 1 out for a guy like Goldy.
     
  10. AkeemOlaDROwon

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    312
    Likes Received:
    455
    Yeah I really don't want to trade any pitching. Replacing 1b is much easier to replace than good pitching. Was just saying that's what they would be asking for if Tucker and Bregman were unavailable in a trade.
     
  11. Rockets12

    Rockets12 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,911
    Likes Received:
    636
    Now we have a great offense but our pitching got worse (in the big leagues and minor leagues)
     
  12. Wolverrines

    Wolverrines Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    953
    Likes Received:
    169
    Because the Astros lack starting pitching.
     
  13. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,378
    Likes Received:
    16,721
    The Astros do not have a complete lack of starting pitching that one of the 6-10 starters can't be traded.
     
  14. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    18,457
    Likes Received:
    14,665
    They lack a #1 and a consistent #2. We do have a plethora of #4 - #5 type guys.
     
  15. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    18,457
    Likes Received:
    14,665
    As long as the haul is #3 or better, then i am on-board with that. But i dont want to thin out that crop for meager offensive help. A game changer? Sure! But my overall feeling about the club is that a way needs to be found to bolster the top of the pitching order. There are too many maybes and uncertainties with the guys we hope fill that role. To stand pat and hope three guys have near career years isnt a good strategy.

    Despite this, I like the offensive moves we have made and the way we made them. My thoughts concern whether this team has real playoff hopes. Not just getting there, but advancing. One more big bat in addition to whats already has been done might give the offense the boost it needed.

    There are some who wont consider this team as a threat until we add a starter or two. Lack of available players to fill this need may lead to it being unmet. We better be in the top 5 in the league in offense then if we are to have a prayer.
     
  16. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,378
    Likes Received:
    16,721
    I'd consider Goldy a game changer.
     
  17. jim1961

    jim1961 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    18,457
    Likes Received:
    14,665
    It boils down to how much we have to give up.
     
  18. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    100,639
    Likes Received:
    102,866
    No kidding. That guy can rake.
     
  19. Jeremy Williams

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2016
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    878
    I'd much rather have EE and not have to sell off all the important parts it would take to acquire Goldy.
     
  20. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    100,639
    Likes Received:
    102,866
    Well sure, I'm just saying it's fun to watch the guy hit.
     

Share This Page