What are we comparing Hillary's corruption to exactly?

I posted this in a RL thread which means no one will take it seriously, so I am making a new thread.

What are we comparing Hillary's corruption to in relative terms to make accusations such as "Hillary is the most corrupt politician of all time?".

What I find most hilarious about the "Hillary is the most corrupt politician ever" platitude is that what are we comparing her 'corruption' to? 30 years of hit pieces, investigations that were self admittedly political and partisan in nature(straight from the mouth of GOP politicians), leaked emails, leaked transcripts etc.

So where are the leaked RNC emails? Where are all the leaked emails of Trump's campaign managers? Newt Gingrich this morning explicitly stated "Hillary Clinton is the most corrupt politician of all time". K, Mr. Gingrich, can we have the RNC emails leaked, yours also Mr. Gingrich along all your speech transcripts etc so we can compare? How the **** can you make this claim when we have no relative comparison?

If you want to make the case that Hillary Clinton is abnormally corrupt relative to the field, then the only rational thing a skeptic would ask to have an even playing field and have RNC emails leaked, prominent GOP politician speech transcripts leaked etc.

Newt, if you are so confident in your claim, why not tell the RNC to post all their private emails to the public? I think it's only fair.

Only one side is having all their private correspondences leaked. Trump nut huggers can't see that. They can't see the pure hypocrisy because they are idiots.

The mere fact that wikileaks ONLY 'leaks' out DNC/Hillary leaks should be a giant red flag of outright bias for any rational skeptic but of course, no one ever pegs a Trump supporter as a 'rational skeptic'.

The most ironic thing about these 'leaks' is in effect, it is making Hillary one of the most transparent candidates of all time.

 

A platitude is "Hillary is the most corrupt politician ever". That's a overplayed statement with no nuance and no relative measurement to compare to and half of our population just accepts that notion without any depth of critical thinking hence 'platitude'.

 

Communist. Why don't you believe in the free market? You think a Yale Law grad with a career in high level government work as a senior and secretary of state isn't going to net a demand from entities to have them appear/lecture or speak?

 

Yes? The Clintons are some of the most recognizable individuals on the planet. They are basically celebrities. Celebrities net similar amounts of money for for appearing in ads or other events.

 

So do you have any explicit evidence besides conjecture?