NY TIMES: Women accuse Trump of inappropriate touching.

you mean his taste in young kids and telling them he'll date them in 10 years?

and he's groping and assaulting them not marrying them not sure he has high standards just for that

 

"I only sexually assault tens"

 

Trump just canceled tonight's scheduled appearance on Hannity:

https://twitter.com/PeterAlexander?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

 

Quit blaming the victim as rape enabler. Bill was never tried for rape, and it isn't because Ken Starr was in the bag for the Clintons. The charges were investigated, and people unfriendly to Bill and Hillary decided not to move to trial.

Anyone who blames Hillary for her husband being unfaithful to her is being foolish. Anyone who keeps saying Bill is a rapist, then show the proof.

 

LOL, another Trump believer.

 

No, Cohete is rational individual who will never support Donald Trump even though constantly defends him with **** false equivalences.

 

I should clarify - believer of Trump's rape-enabler propaganda. There is nothing rational in that.

 

"Rape enabler"? You mean, if Hillary would have reacted differently, Bill would have stopped his misconduct. Like maybe she could divorce him or chew him out really bad, and everything would be solved. Am I understanding you correctly? What's the "rape enabler" idea all about?

 

locker room banter

 

New York Times: not retracting stry about Trump groping" "See us in court":

 

OK. The Clintons had Aliens kill Vince Foster since he accidentally found out ... the truth.

 

NYT would love to go to court I'm sure. The things they would get in discovery about Trump's sexual history would keep them in business for years

 

It's amazing how some people are justifying Bill Clinton's rape and sexual assaults by pointing toward equally damning accusations against Trump. Two wrongs make a right? By the way, if y'all want evidence, the evidence was sitting in the audience at the second debate. Not sure how you missed it.

 

What's amazing is that people keep saying Clinton is guilty of rape. A woman accused him, it was investigated by people not friendly to Bill or Hillary Clinton. It didn't go to trial. He was never found guilty. Proof is not the mere claim of rape. That might be a start.

Two wrongs don't make a right. But stating claims which weren't deemed strong enough to even stand trial as being fact, is most definitely wrong.

Blaming Hillary for anything Bill did is also wrong. Bill is not running for president. Trump is running for president.

 

Well I guess I'm voting for Bob Dole.

 

There you go again with your "two wrongs make a right". As I said about the Clinton campaign: if they did not want accusations made against Bill Clinton then they should not have invoked his name as policy credential and definitely should not have stated that he would be placed into a position of power (corruption?).

I merely defend Trump's rhetoric to shield issues from his personal character. Why you defend the Clintons' corruption and ought right unethical behavior - I have no idea. Do you feel, as an organizational executive, that it is appropriate to use intimidation and manipulation against a person of inferior position to receive sexual favors from that person? I'd call that sexual assault. You may call it "consensual". But that's where you and I disagree.

 

Cohete: Bill is a rapist.
Everybody else: Bill's not running. Hillary is. She didn't rape anybody.
Cohete: Why do you try to justify Bill raping people by accusing Trump?
Everybody else:

 

Your obsession with Bill Clinton in a Presidential contest that doesn't involve him is pretty amazing. You're openly defending, justifying, and supporting rape and assault by a Presidential candidate by pointing to equally damning accusations against a person that's not running for President. It's weird and kind of sad. Just admit you're OK with what Trump does, or criticize Hillary for some false equivalency of her own. But what you're trying to do makes no sense at all - it just demonstrates your sexism in placing a husband's actions on his wife.

 

No you don't. Let's be clear - You're not defending rhetoric. You're defending him against numerous accusations of sexual assault by saying "other people do it too!!!". You don't get to pretend otherwise.

 

Oh he's a sleaze - that part is obvious so maybe standards is the wrong word. I just saying I can't see him putting a move on either of them. Maybe they didn't age well but they appear to be way below average looking.