True, I can't think of a more Anti-American thing said by any nominee of either of the major parties ever. To invite a hostile intel agency from a foreign power to steal documents from An American citizen, or government is incredibly anti-American. To suggest that if the Russians already had possible state documents amongst those 33K emails that they should release them is irresponsible. To hope that someone who has emails with possible sensitive information in them to release those, is nearly as reckless if not more so, than storing those on a secured private server. The reason why it is possibly more reckless is because storing those on a private server is risky, negligent, and dangerous. But it isn't voluntarily putting sensitive documents in the public for consumption To invite a foreign power to make possibly sensitive documents public, is to not be careless with documents but to suggest that possibly sensitive documents be made publicly available. It is actually wishing those documents would be released. Not only was it stupid by Trump, but he no longer has a leg to stand on criticizing her for being careless with the emails to begin with.
Jeff, I respect you. Let's start there. Go watch her responses to the e-mail FBI investigation as juxtaposed to Comey's responses. She's a liar, you can't spin that. Again....she wiped the servers clean. How is Russia going to hack a wiped server that isn't online anymore?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Democrats are now accusing Russia of manipulating our presidential election... exactly what DNC was caught doing. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DNCleak?src=hash">#DNCleak</a></p>— Dr. Jill Stein (@DrJillStein) <a href="https://twitter.com/DrJillStein/status/758392155408769024">July 27, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I guess you agree with his assessment that she was extremely careless too. If her missing e-mails do show up, there's a good shot that she's going to get indicted. He didn't say she didn't do it. He just couldn't find intent. Finally, lying ass corrupt Hillary, lol BTW... I have said on the record, I would have voted for Biden had he been the nominee running against Trump. I have been on the record here saying I want a ban on assault rifles. I guarantee you I look at things more objectively than you do.
Hillary absolutely lied about the server and emails. I think we should be upset that Hillary was carless in making state documents at risk. But shouldn't people also be upset at a nominee for President advocating that if one of our nation's adversaries has those documents, they should release them to the public? Trump lost this as an issue for him. Because... You can't really be upset at those documents being put at risk when you advocate Russia releasing them to the public.
It's weak sauce. If the e-mails were doctored, why did DWS step down. Again the DNC hit the nail on the head with Hillary supporters being ignorant individuals.
If they release the documents and they put lives at risk today, yes. That was the real concern when Hillary made them vulnerable to hacking before. Well that and the illegal activity she was involved in before. If they are released to Wikileaks and then sensitive info is redacted, no.
Trump didn't put any of the qualifiers you did in his request. He said that he wanted them released because he wanted to see them.
You asked me a question and I answered it. Hillary put once top secret and now dated and likely irrelevant at this point info at risk for 4 years to hide her corrupt activities. Save your disgust for the criminal act that actually happened not an off the cuff remark.
I'm actually disgusted by both things. It isn't just an off the cuff remark. It's a remark by somebody who wants to be the leader of the most powerful nation in the world. If his "off the cuff remarks" are that dangerous, then again it should be troubling for people. Again, no matter how careless and negligent Hillary was in keeping the emails there, she was still attempting to keep them from the public. Trump was doing the exact opposite. Not only was he not attempting to keep them from the public, he called for them to be released to the public.
Yawn. Never Trump happened.... but apparently it's ok for the GOP to manipulate their outcome. Sanders lost because his policies were ginger bread houses and sugar plum fairies and he sounded ignorant once you get past the sound bites.
You do realize that the damage is minimal now since the enemy already has the data and has shared it with god knows who. They read it all they know it all. You will want Hillary indicted if the deleted emails prove her guilt. If Trump commits a crime I'd want him indicted. So maybe we get the best of both worlds. Hillary goes to jail when its revealed she did commit a crime and Trump loses support for asking that someone release really old information that they stole and the Libertarian party wins.
Oh okay. So what is in these missing emails then, Perry Mason, the receipt for the gun that killed Vince Foster? Why don't the recipients of these smoking gun emails come forward? If they are so explosive, surely there are thousands of copies floating around, or did the Clintons dispatch their Matrix like cyber hit squad to scrub them out? Let me guess...you have connected the dots in a way that us sheep who accept the most plausible explanation cannot. Good for you, you are very objective.
Unless you are certain you are correct, try not to butt in. Where did Trump ask Russia to cyberattack a server that's no longer online? He asked for them to release data they already had.
My guess is that the Clinton Foundtion is full of illegal activity and because of that being the prime reason she wanted a private server. The email recipients would be co-conspirators. Crooks don't like normal people don't like jail.
