New York Times: Hillary Clinton illegally used private email for all State Dept. business

The Clinton crap.....they are one scandal after another.

 

Coming from you?

DOUBTFUL

Yes, they did. Bush and Cheney, for example, used accounts on the RNC's "private email server."

You're right on this one, whatever business Bush and Cheney conducted on the RNC's private email server will never be known because those emails (22 million or so) were deleted.

Whereas you just lie.

It should be, but we established a LONG time ago that you take no shame from lying.

Bullsh!t of the highest order, this is your biased partisanship talking.

Where conservatives just lie, lie some more, and when nobody believes them, tell an even bigger lie.

Not really, 3/10 at best.

It is always a good day when I get to point out your lies and bullsh!t.

 

[Premium Post]

BRACE YOURSELVES. BIG THINGS ARE HAPPENING AT THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.

There is a very good reason why Bernie has not yet endorsed or dropped out of this race. Yesterday's private meeting with AG Lynch and Bill Clinton was significant. This could erupt quickly, and it's in the Democrats' best interest for all of this to occur prior to their convention, before it's too late to dump Grandma Hillary.


FOLKS, THIS IS REAL

 

*Hops into a chartered limo - where my by-the-hour, early-1990s-Barack Obama-impersonating gentleman caller is waiting with fresh supplies of both the purest Colombian and dankest Jamaican "choom" - and throws my dusty, unmarked VHS copy of Michelle's "Whitey Tape" into the car's VCR*

"Folks, it's never felt so real."

 

Linguistic fluidity does not excuse your cerebral vacuity.

 

From you? Not a snowball's chance in Hell.

OOOOOOH, your all caps statement has me all tingly.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/24/politics/bernie-sanders-will-vote-for-hillary-clinton/index.html

Saying you will vote for your opponent in the general election isn't dropping out, nor is it technically "endorsing" your opponent, but it is a concession nonetheless.

Do you have notes you can share? Of course not, you're speculating as usual.

Bees could take over the planet once a genetically engineered virus wipes out humanity. It is extremely unlikely (maybe even more unlikely than the FBI actually pursuing charges against Clinton), but there is a non-zero probability of it happening.

Just as real as your exact same claim in 2008? You know, the one that caused you to start posting under other monikers for years because you embarrassed yourself so badly?

UNINTENTIONALLY HILARIOUS

 

So what's up with Bill Clinton going out of his way to speak with Loretta Lynch at a Phoenix airport? Does this guy not know how to respect other people's space or not understand what is appropriate contact...oh that's right.

Serious question, should Loretta Lynch recuse herself?

 

The bigger question is "Why did Lynch allow the meeting to take place?"

Once Clinton was there she simply should have said, "Given the current ongoing investigation, I feel its inappropriate for us to be seen speaking in a private setting. Thank you and good day."

And then walked the ____ away.

(and yes...she should recuse and request a special prosecutor be assigned if it comes to that)

 

Excellent post!!!

 

[Premium Post]
The first domino falls today. Loretta Lynch states that she will accept whatever recommendation comes down from the FBI on the emails. With this Obama Administration, and obviously with the Clintons, you have to always ask yourself, "how am I being deceived?" Because this is how these people operate -- attorneys who like to play with words and manipulate those with less ability to identify their deceptions.

The deception here could be twofold: 1) No mention of the Clinton Foundation investigation -- corruption of the highest order; and 2) The obvious situation you have that the FBI is under the Justice Department, so the influence point occurs earlier than the FBI's recommendation being delivered.

The lack of integrity and transparency by Hillary Clinton has already been proven. Any objective person agrees there. She clearly intended to keep her emails private to advance her future political ambitions, and was prepared (and did) subvert the law to accomplish this goal. She stated as much in emails that have already been released (and tens of thousands still haven't been released). How can the Democrats nominate such an unscrupulous person? It speaks to their corruption, really.


GOOD DAY

 

Still don't care.

DD

 

This latest development is exactly what I was referring to earlier. The Clintons do shady **** like this and put their supporters in a position to blindly defend them.

 

What is bad is that they do shady stuff right out in the open... thumbing their noses at everyone. If this situation is so insignificant that they don't mind being shady in public what kind of shady crap is going on behind closed doors?

 

Totally agree. You would think Bill would know better, but maybe he thought nobody would notice? Lynch *absolutely* has to exercise better judgment. She probably didn't know what she could say to a former president when it comes to "get lost, you idiot." Stupid on both their parts, to say the least. A wave and hello would be fine, but that's it.

To the chorus of "blindly follow", I only say most people who are considering voting for HRC are doing so with natural and rational reservations. I know I am. But we can return to "blindly support", "blindly follow," head-in-sand narratives b/c that is easier than giving any sort of intelligence or humanity to your perceived opponents.

 

Says the guy who will likely vote for Donald Trump in November.

HILARIOUS!!!

 

Ugly, ugly stuff.

Even the "head in the sand" liberals are now cringing.

 

If you are sincere, you are in the minority when it comes to her supporters. You are a fool if you think otherwise, read the comments of her supporters in this very thread.

Bill is desparate, that's why he did it. He knows that foundation is a corrupt pile of **** about to be exposed.

 

Even more hilarious is you will likely vote for corrupt Hillary

 

[Educational Post]
If you were a CIA agent on assignment in Syria, and you knew that hostile governments could read the Secretary of State's emails, you would most certainly care. And if you knew that her motivation for sacrificing the security of those emails was her own naked political ambition, then you would be infuriated that she chose her personal benefit over your security and over the national security interest.

Also, everyone should be deeply offended by the Clintons using their influence to reward Clinton Foundation donors (both individuals and foreign politicians/governments). Read the story about Rajiv Fernando from today's Wall Street Journal. He was a big Clinton Foundation donor who was appointed by Cheryl Mills to the Intelligence Security Advisory Board despite having zero credentials for the role. This board has access to the nation's most sensitive intelligence. Ms Mills attempted to conceal information about the appointment, asked her staff to stall the press's inquiries, and then later Mr Fernando resigned before the story blew up. Typical pay-to-play Clinton corruption right there.


GOOD DAY