Utah looking to trade Burke

TJones for Burke.

DD

 

I'd much rather sign Brandon Jennings or Bayless as the backup pg than Burke

 

BINGO

 

Meh. The doctors say he'll be 100% rehabilitated in time for training camp.

Jack can playmake. He'd be a good fit with the bench unit.

 

Pringles won't want him

 

Well, fair enough, but the fact that he always sucked in defense and shooting doesn't exactly help your point.

 

Jones is a RFA.

 

This is who we'll end up with at a bloated price after another failed superstar chase.

 

I mean, it's right to be concerned. But that's plenty of time, technically, to fully resume pivoting sports after acl surgery.

And it's kinda hard to trust any medical report after the D-Mo trade deadline weirdness.

 

watch OUT FOR THIS KID ,He is in a situation where he might be the odd man out. I don't think Phx has given up on Bledsoe yet.

 

ACL tears aren't nearly as tragic as they once were. If Jack doesn't bounce back I'd bet that it's due to his age, not his surgically repaired and now stronger than ever knee.

 

He is already, and i think he's a good fit here but...he seem to be injured a lot...

 

Example of an NBA player coming back from an ACL tear that was just as good as he was before the tear?

 

Nate Johnson's take on the PG market

Spoiler

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My ranking of the free agent point guards. <a href="https://t.co/NRSyLoXphZ">pic.twitter.com/NRSyLoXphZ</a></p>&mdash; Nate Duncan (@NateDuncanNBA) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateDuncanNBA/status/748226693333028865">June 29, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

BimaThug's take on Jarret Jack:

Spoiler

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In this market, Jarrett Jack at $6.3M for one year is a decent value...if he's healthy come October. <a href="https://t.co/UXzAnWOfNe">https://t.co/UXzAnWOfNe</a></p>&mdash; David Weiner (@BimaThug) <a href="https://twitter.com/BimaThug/status/747938338959560704">June 28, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

Ill stick with the 40 y.o.

 

Well it's hard to say, but I mean I'm sure Bayless could be had for 5-7 mill a season, throw him a 2-3 year contract with TO. Jennings on the other hand, that all depends on how he feels about his situation since he's coming off an injury. I'd offer him the exact same thing as Bayless, if he turns the corner, great value! If not, He's not the worse contract we have by a non producer we have.