Due to not being surprised at Ramsey following his own best interest and Jon's return seemingly to be a given, I thought the most interesting revelation is that Bran isn't going to be incorporated into the tree like that other dude and will eventually leave. I don't know why I expected him to eventually get stuck there, but I'd always had the impression that was kind of his final destination.
The legitimacy of "Roose Bolton was poisoned" went out the window when Lady Walder and the baby were destroyed by the dogs. Walder is too smart to ignore the lack of a body Speaking of which, I guess it goes into the whole "maddog" mentality, but there was no reason to kill lady walder and the baby with Roose being dead. In the end, I think it hurts Ramsey more than anything
and someone just punch Ramsay in the mug lol while they are at it I think Roose Bolton was kind of involved back stage in the Red Wedding as I can vaguely recall? It serves him right although his b*stard son Ramsay is really annoying.
Drogo got a cut on his chest when challenged by another Dothraki. The wound festered and he became to weak to ride and thus unable to lead. About to die, Dany has the Maegi use magic to save his live. Dany goes into labor and the baby is stillborn, the price for saving Drogo's life. Drogo lives but he's a vegetable. So Dany smothers him with a pillow and burns the Maegi alive on Drogo's funeral pyre, which is also the fire that hatched the dragon eggs. So, no, Drogo didn't die before the magic spell. But he is dead now.
The baby was a threat because it was a legitimate heir to House Bolton. The Karstark had just told Roose that his hold on the North would never be secure as long as a Stark could walk back into Winterfell. I'm sure Ramsey feels that as long as there's another son of Roose out there, one who isn't a b*stard, his hold on the title Lord Bolton would never be fully secure either. Walda is a different story.
I kind of question the motivation too. Not to still be that guy, but Davos is off doing something else in the books and isn't at Castle Black, so the questionable motivation has to do with the show forcing him into a setting/situation that wasn't part of the original story.
Isn't Brienne's sword called Oathkeeper? Or something similar? May have to do with that. Or not. Who knows. I'm just in here for the lulz. And Jon Snow going ham.
True, even though he was "legitimized" there is definitely the chance of a future conflict (see the Blackfyre Rebellions)
What did Jamie Lannister mean by he faced worst odds than the 30 plus high sparrow guys that were in that chapel? Did he actually think he can kill them all with one hand while being cornered in like that? Or was this in the past when he had both hands? If so was he that bad ass? I don't recall him owning anyone in the past to make me believe he could defy those odds. Or was he just talking trash in front of his dead daughter?
They've mentioned it in the show, but more so in the books that Jamie Lannister was pretty much the most bad ass sword fighter in Westeros before he lost his hand. Could he have killed 30 sparrow guys back before he lost his hand? Maybe, which is crazy. Could he have done it since he lost his hand? No chance. When he's talking about facing worse odds, he's probably talking about when he was held captive by the Starks.
Which a certain character from the show names "Oathbreaker", but I don't know if that character or his/her situation can be shoe-horned into Episode 3 and Brienne.
