New York Times: Hillary Clinton illegally used private email for all State Dept. business

It's very basic what wipe is in the PC world. Bobby doesn't know much.

 

You mean like wipe with a cloth?

I don't think it's unfair to say someone wiped a server when they attempted to delete literally all the data from the server. Just because the FBI was able to recover it shouldn't make a difference.

Anyway, the spin has been fun, but I'm gong to go back to watching The Untouchables now, it's a fun story about the FBI's security review of Al Capone's business interests.

 

That is incorrect.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/15/sources-review-affirms-clinton-server-emails-were-top-secret-despite-department-challenge.html

As previously stated, you don't grant someone immunity from prosecution for no reason.

Even if it was true, she had SAP information on her private server. just unreal.

 

Hmm... Fox News, an unnamed intelligence community review, and two unnamed sources. That cinches it...

 

I hear tea partiers don't like to wipe at all.

I know that the whole classification system is a joke with departments classifying things out of paranoia and for turf wars and avoiding sharing of info, and hiding their own mistakes. 50-75% of what is classified shouldn't be classified and much of it gets declassified anyway.

Most folks in gov't including pretty much every leader in the modern era would be considered a criminal if sharing classified material without authorization was strictly enforced - it happens a lot without consequence and isn't considered a big deal.

Except by zealots on w witch hunt who need to invent scandals.

 

Thank you for confirming you have no clue what you are talking about.

 

Nah - you just have no argument to counter with.

 

No....it's just that a counter argument is pointless when speaking with an entirely ignorant person. You are here spouting spin and you've obviously never had ANY experience with the matter.

In your mind, gross mishandling of classified information is common and without consequence. That's entirely false, both parts. The fact that you don't know any better than that shows that you really shouldn't be speaking to begin with.

 

Funny, because I feel you are the grossly ignorant person who I am I foolishly being patient with.

But I will try

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...64c1a4-5d72-11e5-b38e-06883aacba64_story.html

THis is from the wikipedia page:

 

Ignorant people such as yourself often feel that way due to the fact that they don't even know enough to know how little they actually know. If you knew a little bit more, you might know enough to realize that you know nothing. Here's to hoping your education takes a step forward in the near future.

 

Also, before you respond with something else stupid, ask yourself if you have any direct experience with the intelligence community. If that answer is no, consider keeping your mouth shut as an alternative to spewing more ignorance or spin.

 

No deleting everything or even formatting isn't wipe. Data are quite easily recoverable. Wipe is a security measure to ensure data aren't recoverable.

If Clinton had her server's drives wiped and that was done correctly, it would not be recoverable.

 

To both you and Bobbythegreat Sweet Lou has presented the evidence I was going to. Further your own source says that the State Dept. challenged whether that info should've been classified. As Secretary of State it would make sense that she and her staff didn't see it that way.

As I said before Clinton's judgement certainly deserves criticism and if there is a crime it is one of negligence. At the moment it doesn't appear like there was nefarious intent.

 

I just posted something for you - which you ignored and instead choose to go on an ad hominem diatribe. I will not lower myself to your level. It's clear you don't have much experience with the Intelligence community - someone from that community would never act the way you are here.

 

You posted spin, we've been over that before.

 

Ignorantia juris non excusat

 

Very true, and "I don't agree that the information should be classified thus it's okay to ignore classification" is also not a justification or excuse.

 

[Premium Post]
Julian Castro's brother says this morning that FBI Suspect Hillary Clinton has been cleared by the Justice Department! Of course, this was a nonsensical piece of babble that was immediately debunked by liberal host Dana Bash. The libs are so desperate for fresh Hispanic blood in their leadership that they will push these complete airheads of candidates out there hoping that their Hispanic heritage and a nice smile will avoid any scrutiny of their policy positions or intelligence. Sadly, in the case of Joaquin Castro, who I believe may have a learning disability that prevents him from learning Spanish or staying current on news, the show was unable to shield him from humiliating himself.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/06/c...department-gets-called-out-immediately-video/

Can you believe the libs are about to elect a candidate that is under FBI investigation for compromising United States intelligence and endangering assets around the world? Put aside that she was the worst Secretary of State in modern history, prioritized her political future over the life of our ambassador to Libya, accepted bribes through her work at the Clinton Foundation and through speeches to Wall Street banks, and persecuted her husband's rape victims for decades -- put all of that aside. On what planet is a single one of things things not a complete disqualification for being President?

 

They don't disqualify her because they are not true. Lies about a candidate can't disqualify a candidate because they are lies. If they were true as you state them, no one in their right mind would support her. But when you lie, you have nothing to stand on.

 

[Premium Post]
Even if voters do not believe that Hillary risked American lives by housing top secret intel on her homebrew server, and even if you think that her decisions and votes to invade Iraq, invade Libya, let Syria descend into chaos, and let Russia humiliate our country on the international stage... and even if you believe she was not responsible for the death of Ambassador Chris Stephens and then lied about what caused it for political reasons.. even if you believe she is not influenced by the tens of millions of dollars that Wall Street paid her for speeches (which she won't release), and even if you have no problems with foreign governments and officials donating to the Clinton Foundation and not expecting kickbacks later... even if all of those things can be excused, as well as the fact that she is the single most divisive politician on earth... even if you wash all of those things away... there is one thing that cannot, I repeat, CANNOT, be excused. HER DANCING.

<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9oFhPWGmSC8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

My gosh, that looks like a woman who has not laid with a man in decades. If I walked into a party and saw that troupe of dancers, I would know that my social life had ended.