New York Times: Hillary Clinton illegally used private email for all State Dept. business

It is very offensive for this blatant race bater to do this. He probably has to hide this part of himself at his office job so he lets it out on this site.

Bigtexx is either a hard core racist or at best he is like some of the more ignorant frat boys singing racist initiation songs who probably don't view themselves as racists.
.

 

Yet you cannot even find a single racist post I've ever made on this board.

no cred

 

New Quinnipac Poll Just Released...Bernie 49% Hillary 46% O'Malley 3. self.SandersForPresident
submitted 7 hours ago * by CSKemal
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/ia/ia02012016_Ifsmb28.pdf

 

Of course a single post taken independently cannot prove definitively that one is a racist, but if you take the plurality of your posts, ranging from diverse subjects, and analyzed them together, one does come to the conclusion that your viewpoints are more often than not, err on the side of a racist.

 

No.

Just because I think Obama is a clueless idiot and has terrible policies does not mean I'm racist.

 

However, it does mean that they are race-baiting liars if they bear false witness against you in this manner.

 

you are a pillar of equality

 

there are lives in the balance.

[rquoter]I can confirm that the FoxNews report, which lacks any specifics about exactly what was compromised, is accurate. And what was actually in those Top Secret emails found on Hillary’s “unclassified” personal bathroom server was colossally damaging to our national security and has put lives at risk.

Discussions with Intelligence Community officials have revealed that Ms. Clinton’s “unclassified” emails included Holy Grail items of American espionage such as the true names of Central Intelligence Agency intelligence officers serving overseas under cover. Worse, some of those exposed are serving under non-official cover. NOCs (see this for an explanation of their important role in espionage) are the pointy end of the CIA spear and they are always at risk of exposure – which is what Ms. Clinton’s emails have done.

Not only have these spies had their lives put in serious risk by this, it’s a clear violation of Federal law. The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, enacted due to the murder of the CIA’s station chief in Athens after his cover was blown by the left-wing media, makes it a Federal crime to divulge the true identity of any covert operative serving U.S. intelligence if that person has not previous been publicly acknowledged to be working for our spy agencies.[/rquoter]

http://observer.com/2016/02/breaking-hillary-clinton-put-spies-lives-at-risk/

 

If true, this is truly disgusting and a clear violation of law. Can you imagine if you are these CIA agents' families? Hilary's shameful cover up of this issue and slow trickle of information to surface is absolutely reprehensible.

 

Don't make us go back and see what you and basso thought about the lives compromised when Plame's name was leaked. I remember very clearly there was zero concern about them from both of you at the time.

 

HILLARY WAS THE SECRETARY OF STATE!

you're more interested in trying to paint people as hypocrites than discussing this topic. Quit deflecting.

 

Well, if someone is actually more interested in embodying a hypocrite, as opposed to genuine interest in the topic, beyond standard, boring partisan posturing, then yeah, I think it's fair to call that poster out. FWIW.

None of this sniping is contributing to the thread though, I'll give you that. Not that is has much substance to begin with. Feels more and more like iBenghazi. The odds that basso's find there has any credibility, given the source and the purple prose, are honestly very low.

Wish we could get some unfiltered data out of this story but it's too much of a political slobber-fest.

 

I don't like anything about this whole e-mail business. I especially don't like the idea that intel operatives could be exposed.

You commented on your "concern" for those exposed agents and their families.

 

And someone went to jail over the Plame incident.....

 

and it wasn't the person who revealed her name.

 

Well, the person who went to jail (and he didn't go for long) sort of fell on the sword for the person that was probably really guilty. Because of that and the lack of hard evidence, it ended there.

In this incident, there is hard evidence against Hillary because they have HER emails and HER server so it's a bit different. There's really no one to fall on the sword for her, but I'm sure if this keeps going forward they'll come up with some staffer to try to take the blame for Hillary. I'm not sure that'll work though given the hard evidence.

 

Mundus vult decipi.

 

I wasn't comparing the incident to the Plame incident. I was comparing the supposed "concern" for operatives from two of the posters.

I'm fine if Hillary goes to jail should the investigation move that way in this case too.

 

this is the droid you're looking for:

Spoiler